These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31590570)

  • 1. How Do Drivers Respond to Silent Automation Failures? Driving Simulator Study and Comparison of Computational Driver Braking Models.
    Bianchi Piccinini G; Lehtonen E; Forcolin F; Engström J; Albers D; Markkula G; Lodin J; Sandin J
    Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1212-1229. PubMed ID: 31590570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian Regression Analysis of the Effects of Alert Presence and Scenario Criticality on Automated Vehicle Takeover Performance.
    Alambeigi H; McDonald AD
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):288-305. PubMed ID: 33908795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergency braking is affected by the use of cruise control.
    Jammes Y; Behr M; Llari M; Bonicel S; Weber JP; Berdah S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):636-641. PubMed ID: 28118033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour--a driving simulator study.
    Markvollrath ; Schleicher S; Gelau C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21376911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effects of Vehicle Automation on Driver Engagement: The Case of Adaptive Cruise Control and Mind Wandering.
    Weaver SM; Roldan SM; Gonzalez TB; Balk SA; Philips BH
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):1086-1098. PubMed ID: 33296230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usability testing of three visual HMIs for assisted driving: How design impacts driver distraction and mental models.
    Perrier MJR; Louw TL; Carsten OMJ
    Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 36259259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.
    McDonald AD; Alambeigi H; Engström J; Markkula G; Vogelpohl T; Dunne J; Yuma N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):642-688. PubMed ID: 30830804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency and Quality of Exposure to Adaptive Cruise Control and Impact on Trust, Workload, and Mental Models.
    Pai G; Zhang F; Hungund AP; Pamarthi J; Roberts SC; Horrey WJ; Pradhan AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107130. PubMed ID: 37336048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.