These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The representational locus of spatial influence on backward inhibition. Arbuthnott KD Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 19460958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of inhibition in task switching: a review. Koch I; Gade M; Schuch S; Philipp AM Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 20081154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions. Meiran N; Pereg M Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 28219260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Instructed Task-Switch Evaluation Effect: Is the Instruction to Switch Tasks Sufficient to Dislike Task Switch Cues? Van Dessel P; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J J Cogn; 2020 Jan; 3(1):1. PubMed ID: 31934683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Grange JA; Houghton G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of temporal cue-target overlap in backward inhibition under task switching. Druey MD; Hübner R Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Aug; 14(4):749-54. PubMed ID: 17972744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression. Regev S; Meiran N Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 25822920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of stimulus format on task inhibition during task switching. Sdoia S; Zivi P; Ferlazzo F Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2185-2194. PubMed ID: 35015110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of task location and task type on backward inhibition. Arbuthnott K Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 18491493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression. Regev S; Meiran N Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):168-181. PubMed ID: 26762518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Backward Crosstalk Effect Does Not Depend on the Degree of a Preceding Response Conflict. Schonard C; Ulrich R; Janczyk M Exp Psychol; 2020 Sep; 67(5):277-291. PubMed ID: 33167820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The neurophysiological basis of reward effects on backward inhibition processes. Zhang R; Stock AK; Beste C Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():163-171. PubMed ID: 27262242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smaller backward crosstalk effects for free choice tasks are not the result of immediate conflict adaptation. Naefgen C; Janczyk M Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 30306368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]