260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31590612)
1. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations.
Geißler G; Arweiler I; Hehrmann P; Lenarz T; Hamacher V; Büchner A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 24993633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Nopp P; Péan V; J Govaerts P
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 31453760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
Hagen R; Radeloff A; Stark T; Anderson I; Nopp P; Aschbacher E; Möltner A; Khajehnouri Y; Rak K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31524107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions.
Buechner A; Dyballa KH; Hehrmann P; Fredelake S; Lenarz T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95542. PubMed ID: 24755864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Kerber S; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems.
Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
