These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31592052)

  • 1. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
    Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations.
    Costa T; Rezende M; Sakamoto A; Bittencourt B; Dalzochio P; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 27892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of a Self-Etch Adhesive Containing Nanobioglass on Postoperative Sensitivity of Posterior Composite Restorations - A Randomized Trial.
    Aboelenein AZ; Riad MI; Haridy MF
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2313-2320. PubMed ID: 31592280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal and marginal adaptation of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites in class II cavities placed with different adhesive strategies.
    Haak R; Näke T; Park KJ; Ziebolz D; Krause F; Schneider H
    Odontology; 2019 Jul; 107(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 30569286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial.
    Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Barceleiro MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2019 Sep; 33(0):e089. PubMed ID: 31531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Following Restoration of Class I Lesions with Different Restorative Materials: An
    Mushtaq U; Mushtaq F; Thakur D; Rathee K; Poonia N; Khullar S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):650-654. PubMed ID: 34393122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material.
    McHugh LEJ; Politi I; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):e329-e335. PubMed ID: 28688735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.
    Francois P; Vennat E; Le Goff S; Ruscassier N; Attal JP; Dursun E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2599-2608. PubMed ID: 30317399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro Evaluation and Comparison of Microleakage of Two Restorative Composite Resins in Class II Situations using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.
    Nanda BD; Sharma P; Moudgil M; Sharma V; Gupta AK; Gupta D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1100-1104. PubMed ID: 30287711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.