186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31592511)
21. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography.
Reid TD; Chan DS; Roberts SA; Crosby TD; Williams GT; Lewis WG
Br J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1925-31. PubMed ID: 23169281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in oesophageal malignancy.
Griffiths EA; Brummell Z; Gorthi G; Pritchard SA; Welch IM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 May; 32(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16504455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New 3-Tiered Circumferential Resection Margin Criteria in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee GD; Lee SE; Kim KM; Kim YH; Ahn JH; Jung S; Choi YL; Kim HR; Park SI; Shim YM
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 26501489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic significance of cancer within 1 mm of the circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer patients following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Salih T; Jose P; Mehta SP; Mirza A; Udall G; Pritchard SA; Hayden JD; Grabsch HI
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 43(3):562-7. PubMed ID: 22665383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.
Saha AK; Sutton C; Rotimi O; Dexter S; Sue-Ling H; Sarela AI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 19252949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after concurrent chemoradiation therapy and surgery.
Liu CY; Wang BY; Lee MY; Tsai YC; Liu CC; Shih CH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2013 Oct; 76(10):570-5. PubMed ID: 23938149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circumferential margin positivity and its impact on prognosis in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.
Sujendran V; Wheeler J; Baron R; Warren BF; Maynard N
Br J Surg; 2008 Feb; 95(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 17948302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of circumferential resection margin on prognosis in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer approached through the transhiatal route.
Scheepers JJ; van der Peet DL; Veenhof AA; Cuesta MA
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19196265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Meta-analysis of prognostic factors of overall survival in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
Kamarajah SK; Marson EJ; Zhou D; Wyn-Griffiths F; Lin A; Evans RPT; Bundred JR; Singh P; Griffiths EA
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 32448903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic value of added stratification of circumferential resection margin status in oesophageal carcinoma.
Ahmad J; Loughrey MB; Donnelly D; Ranaghan L; Shah R; Napolitano G; Kennedy AJ
Histopathology; 2013 Apr; 62(5):752-63. PubMed ID: 23530586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimally Invasive Circumferential Hiatal Dissection for the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Distal Esophagus and Esophago-gastric Junction: Technical Considerations Combined With Histopathological Outcomes.
Lorenzi B; Davakis S; Syllaios A; Kordzadeh A; Kadri M; Ram M; Fareed K; Barter C; Charalabopoulos A
Anticancer Res; 2019 Jun; 39(6):3219-3225. PubMed ID: 31177171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of criteria and clinical significance of circumferential resection margins in esophageal cancer.
Deeter M; Dorer R; Kuppusamy MK; Koehler RP; Low DE
Arch Surg; 2009 Jul; 144(7):618-24. PubMed ID: 19620541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical outcomes and benefits for staging of surgical lymph node mapping after esophagectomy.
Lagarde SM; Phillips AW; Navidi M; Disep B; Griffin SM
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 28881884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer.
Khan OA; Fitzgerald JJ; Soomro I; Beggs FD; Morgan WE; Duffy JP
Br J Cancer; 2003 May; 88(10):1549-52. PubMed ID: 12771920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin post neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Patrão AS; Papaxoinis G; Kordatou Z; Weaver JM; Owen-Holt V; Alkhaffaf B; Galloway S; Mansoor W
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 30786962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiological prediction of positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer.
Foley KG; Christian A; Patel N; Lewis WG; Roberts SA
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():119-124. PubMed ID: 30292255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu J; Hu Y; Xu L
Updates Surg; 2022 Aug; 74(4):1187-1197. PubMed ID: 35212980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of incremental circumferential resection margin distance on overall survival and recurrence in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Knight WRC; Zylstra J; Wulaningsih W; Van Hemelrijck M; Landau D; Maisey N; Gaya A; Baker CR; Gossage JA; Largergren J; Davies AR;
BJS Open; 2018 Aug; 2(4):229-237. PubMed ID: 30079392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement.
Suttie SA; Nanthakumaran S; Mofidi R; Rapson T; Gilbert FJ; Thompson AM; Park KG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 22154884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic relevance of the revised R status definition in pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis.
Leonhardt CS; Niesen W; Kalkum E; Klotz R; Hank T; Büchler MW; Strobel O; Probst P
BJS Open; 2022 Mar; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 35301513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
