195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31592799)
1. Prostate Carcinoma Grade and Length But Not Cribriform Architecture at Positive Surgical Margins Are Predictive for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 31592799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients.
Hansum T; Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van Wezel T; van der Poel H; Bekers E; Helleman J; Remmers S; van Leenders GJLH
Mod Pathol; 2021 Nov; 34(11):2064-2070. PubMed ID: 34175896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kryvenko ON; Iakymenko OA; De Lima Guido LP; Bhattu AS; Merhe A; Mouzannar A; Briski LM; Oymagil I; Lugo I; Nemov I; Ritch CR; Kava BR; Punnen S; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1012-1017. PubMed ID: 34739539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 30349027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases.
Kates M; Sopko NA; Han M; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 26264998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Roobol MJ; Helleman J; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2020 Apr; 76(5):755-762. PubMed ID: 31944367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: the role of prognostic grade group and index tumor nodule.
Vau N; Henriques V; Cheng L; Blanca A; Fonseca J; Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Lopez-Beltran A
Hum Pathol; 2019 Nov; 93():6-15. PubMed ID: 31442520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.
Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Incrocci L; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
Mod Pathol; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 28530220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the addition of detailed pathology of the positive surgical margin and cribriform growth.
Remmers S; Hollemans E; Nieboer D; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Helleman J; Roobol MJ
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Feb; 56():151842. PubMed ID: 34717190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van Wezel T; van der Poel H; Bekers E; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Mod Pathol; 2021 Jan; 34(1):184-193. PubMed ID: 32686748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
