These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31592902)

  • 21. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.
    Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J; O'Connell BP
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 33885267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interactions Between Slopes of Residual Hearing and Frequency Maps in Simulated Bimodal and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Straw S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 67(1):282-295. PubMed ID: 38092067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
    Tejani VD; Brown CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users.
    Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Overlapping frequency coverage and simulated spatial cue effects on bimodal (electrical and acoustical) sentence recognition in noise.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):851-61. PubMed ID: 25234893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Nix EP; Thompson NJ; Brown KD; Dedmon MM; Selleck AM; Overton AB; Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec; 44(10):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 37758328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing.
    Shim H; Kim S; Hong J; Na Y; Woo J; Hansen M; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 427():108649. PubMed ID: 36462377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Stickney GS; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15807023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.