229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31592962)
1. Topical Review: Effects of Contact Lens Wear on Corneal, Conjunctival, and Lid Margin Sensitivity.
Stapleton F; Chao C; Golebiowski B
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):790-801. PubMed ID: 31592962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corneal and conjunctival sensory function: the impact on ocular surface sensitivity of change from low to high oxygen transmissibility contact lenses.
Golebiowski B; Papas EB; Stapleton F
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1177-81. PubMed ID: 22281824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lid Margin Sensitivity and Staining in Contact Lens Wear Versus No Lens Wear.
Navascues-Cornago M; Morgan PB; Maldonado-Codina C
Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):808-16. PubMed ID: 25933399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective Assessment of Ocular Surface Response to Contact Lens Wear in Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers of Asian Descent.
Guillon M; Dumbleton K; Theodoratos P; Patel T; Karkkainen T; Moody K
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):182-189. PubMed ID: 27755285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive objective and contemporary methods for measuring ocular surface inflammation in soft contact lens wearers - A review.
Chao C; Richdale K; Jalbert I; Doung K; Gokhale M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):273-282. PubMed ID: 28602547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive Potential of Eyelids and Tear Film in Determining Symptoms in Contact Lens Wearers.
Siddireddy JS; Tan J; Vijay AK; Willcox M
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Nov; 95(11):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 30339638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytomorphological assessment of the lid margin in relation to symptoms, contact lens wear and lid wiper epitheliopathy.
Muntz A; Subbaraman LN; Craig JP; Jones L
Ocul Surf; 2020 Apr; 18(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 31821876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort.
Deng Z; Wang J; Jiang H; Fadli Z; Liu C; Tan J; Zhou J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 170():197-205. PubMed ID: 27542928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conjunctival sensitivity in pathological cases, with simultaneous measurement of corneal and lid margin sensitivity.
Norn MS
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1975 Jun; 53(3):450-7. PubMed ID: 1101626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Malleability of the ocular surface in response to mechanical stress induced by orthokeratology contact lenses.
Lu F; Simpson T; Sorbara L; Fonn D
Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 18216565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tear film evaluation and management in soft contact lens wear: a systematic approach.
Downie LE; Craig JP
Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Sep; 100(5):438-458. PubMed ID: 28940531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CLEAR - Effect of contact lens materials and designs on the anatomy and physiology of the eye.
Morgan PB; Murphy PJ; Gifford KL; Gifford P; Golebiowski B; Johnson L; Makrynioti D; Moezzi AM; Moody K; Navascues-Cornago M; Schweizer H; Swiderska K; Young G; Willcox M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Apr; 44(2):192-219. PubMed ID: 33775377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers.
Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear on ocular surface sensitivity to tactile, pneumatic mechanical, and chemical stimulation.
Situ P; Simpson TL; Jones LW; Fonn D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6111-7. PubMed ID: 20592230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ocular surface microvascular response and its relation to contact lens fitting and ocular comfort: an update of recent research.
Fang M; Airen S; Jiang H; Wang J
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Aug; 104(6):661-671. PubMed ID: 33689669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between conjunctival goblet cells and corneal resident dendritic cell density changes in new contact lens wearers.
Colorado LH; Pritchard N; Alzahrani Y; Edwards K; Efron N
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Nov; 103(6):787-791. PubMed ID: 32808398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal Nerve Morphology, Sensitivity, and Tear Neuropeptides in Contact Lens Wear.
Golebiowski B; Chao C; Stapleton F; Jalbert I
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Apr; 94(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 28338565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft daily disposable contact lenses in neophyte wearers.
Wolffsohn JS; Dhirajlal H; Vianya-Estopa M; Nagra M; Madden L; Sweeney LE; Goodyear AS; Kerr LV; Terry L; Sheikh S; Murphy O; Lloyd A; Maldonado-Codina C;
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 31543407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of a 0.9% sodium chloride ophthalmic solution on the ocular surface of symptomatic contact lens wearers.
Barabino S; Rolando M; Camicione P; Chen W; Calabria G
Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 40(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15825529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule.
Brennan NA; Coles ML; Comstock TL; Levy B
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 12045062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
