These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31593232)

  • 1. Attending to Eliza: rapid brain responses reflect competence attribution in virtual social feedback processing.
    Schindler S; Miller GA; Kissler J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 14(10):1073-1086. PubMed ID: 31593232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language-based social feedback processing with randomized "senders": An ERP study.
    Schindler S; Kissler J
    Soc Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 13(2):202-213. PubMed ID: 28103746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. People matter: Perceived sender identity modulates cerebral processing of socio-emotional language feedback.
    Schindler S; Kissler J
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():160-169. PubMed ID: 27039140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotion in Context: How Sender Predictability and Identity Affect Processing of Words as Imminent Personality Feedback.
    Schindler S; Vormbrock R; Kissler J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():94. PubMed ID: 30774611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attributed social context and emotional content recruit frontal and limbic brain regions during virtual feedback processing.
    Schindler S; Kruse O; Stark R; Kissler J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):239-252. PubMed ID: 30414041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus.
    Schindler S; Wegrzyn M; Steppacher I; Kissler J
    J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 35(15):6010-9. PubMed ID: 25878274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imagined veridicality of social feedback amplifies early and late brain responses.
    Schindler S; Bruchmann M; Straube T
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 15(6):678-687. PubMed ID: 33243096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do emojis influence social interactions? Neural and behavioral responses to affective emojis in bargaining situations.
    Weiß M; Gutzeit J; Rodrigues J; Mussel P; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Apr; 56(4):e13321. PubMed ID: 30628097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE; Abraham KS; Alschuler DM; Alvarenga JE; Skipper J; Warner V; Bruder GE; Weissman MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():337-350. PubMed ID: 27263509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence that disrupted orienting to evaluative social feedback undermines error correction in rejection sensitive women.
    Mangels JA; Hoxha O; Lane SP; Jarvis SN; Downey G
    Soc Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 13(4):451-470. PubMed ID: 28724323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-mediated communication preferences predict biobehavioral measures of social-emotional functioning.
    Babkirk S; Luehring-Jones P; Dennis-Tiwary TA
    Soc Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(6):637-51. PubMed ID: 26613269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of age on the neural correlates of feedback processing in a naturalistic gambling game.
    West R; Tiernan BN; Kieffaber PD; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):734-45. PubMed ID: 24758702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatiotemporal pattern of appraising social and emotional relevance: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Schacht A; Vrtička P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1172-1187. PubMed ID: 30132268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient and sustained ERP activity related to feedback processing in the probabilistic selection task.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():1-12. PubMed ID: 29499240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociable effects of reward and expectancy during evaluative feedback processing revealed by topographic ERP mapping analysis.
    Gheza D; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):213-225. PubMed ID: 29179993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional heterogeneity of perceived control in feedback processing.
    Zheng Y; Wang M; Zhou S; Xu J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2020 May; 15(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 32163168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond the FN: A spatio-temporal analysis of the neural correlates of feedback processing in a virtual Blackjack game.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S; Kieffaber PD
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():104-15. PubMed ID: 24607733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are event-related potentials to dynamic facial expressions of emotion related to individual differences in the accuracy of processing facial expressions and identity?
    Recio G; Wilhelm O; Sommer W; Hildebrandt A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):364-380. PubMed ID: 28097516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by the presence of an audience: An electrophysiological investigation.
    Tian T; Feng X; Gu R; Broster LS; Feng C; Wang L; Guan Q; Luo YJ
    Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 1615():139-147. PubMed ID: 25935695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It's all in your head - how anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives.
    Schindler S; Wegrzyn M; Steppacher I; Kissler J
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1292. PubMed ID: 25426095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.