These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31593820)

  • 1. Implementation of a digital chain for the design and manufacture of implant-based surgical guides in a hospital setting.
    Pajot T; Benichou L; Moreau E; Tallon V; Meningaud JP; Khonsari RH; Ketoff S
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 121(4):347-351. PubMed ID: 31593820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital impression, DVT, and 3D printing - implantology in the digital workflow.
    Frahsek G
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 36825569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery.
    Flügge TV; Nelson K; Schmelzeisen R; Metzger MC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(8):1340-6. PubMed ID: 23866950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully Digital Workflow with Magnetically Connected Guides for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation Following Guided Alveolar Ridge Reduction.
    Costa AJM; Teixeira Neto AD; Burgoa S; Gutierrez V; Cortes ARG
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):272-276. PubMed ID: 32020699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Research advances in the use of digital surgical guides in implantology].
    Wang XH; Liu AP; Deng WZ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 38(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 32037774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital workflow for 3D printed implant surgical guides.
    Goodacre BJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):205. PubMed ID: 35241263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable?
    Al Yafi F; Camenisch B; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):381-397. PubMed ID: 31097133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of metal sleeve-free 3D-printed implant surgical guides.
    Oh KC; Park JM; Shim JS; Kim JH; Kim JE; Kim JH
    Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):468-476. PubMed ID: 30685109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications.
    Vercruyssen M; Fortin T; Widmann G; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):214-27. PubMed ID: 25123770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
    Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report.
    Oh JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2541-2549. PubMed ID: 28881181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Guided and computer-assisted implant surgery and prosthetic: The continuous digital workflow].
    Pascual D; Vaysse J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2016 Feb; 117(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 26781159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guided Immediate Implant Placement with Wound Closure by Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Sealing Socket Abutment: Case Report.
    Finelle G; Lee SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):e63-e67. PubMed ID: 28291855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-Aided Planning and Placement in Implant Surgery.
    Deeb GR; Tran DQ; Deeb JG
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2020 Sep; 28(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 32741514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the fabrication method on the three-dimensional accuracy of an implant surgery template.
    Matta RE; Bergauer B; Adler W; Wichmann M; Nickenig HJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):804-808. PubMed ID: 28363503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CAD/CAM guided surgery in implant dentistry. A review of software packages and step-by-step protocols for planning surgical guides.
    Scherer MD; Kattadiyil MT; Parciak E; Puri S
    Alpha Omegan; 2014; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24881445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic Navigation for Surgical Implant Placement: Overview of Technology, Key Concepts, and a Case Report.
    Mandelaris GA; Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Oct; 39(9):614-621; quiz 622. PubMed ID: 30299111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.