These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31593820)
21. Computer-Guided Dental Implant Treatment of Complete Arch Restoration of Edentulous and Terminal Dentition Patients. Orentlicher G; Horowitz A; Kobren L Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Aug; 31(3):399-426. PubMed ID: 31253346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Temporary Shell Proof-of-Concept Technique: Digital-Assisted Workflow to Enable Customized Immediate Function in Two Visits in Partially Edentulous Patients. Pozzi A; Arcuri L; Moy PK Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2018 Mar; 39(3):e9-e12. PubMed ID: 29493252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Digital Workflow for Implant Treatment and Occlusal Reconstruction in a Patient with an Edentulous Mandible: A Case History Report. Liang C; Lin X; Li J; Geng W Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 32956438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modified flapless dental implant surgery for planning treatment in a maxilla including sinus lift augmentation through use of virtual surgical planning and a 3-dimensional model. Nikzad S; Azari A; Ghassemzadeh A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2291-8. PubMed ID: 20576335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study. Derksen W; Wismeijer D; Flügge T; Hassan B; Tahmaseb A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 31330566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Sterilisation of patient specific surgical guide for dental implantology made in a hospital: Validation of a sterility test and structural deformation study]. Ribier Z; Dacosta-Noble E; Benichou L; Ketoff S; Talon V; Bézie Y; Lourtet-Hascoet J; Moreau E Ann Pharm Fr; 2021 Sep; 79(5):582-588. PubMed ID: 33516720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area. Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital technology for performing a nasopalatine and greater palatine nerve block with a modified implant surgical guide: A technique article. Dahiya A; Garbacea A; Kattadiyil MT; AlHelal A J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):338-342. PubMed ID: 29627214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients with an Intraoral Scanner and Old Complete Denture. An X; Yang HW; Choi BH J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):715-718. PubMed ID: 31087422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability. Schubert O; Schweiger J; Stimmelmayr M; Nold E; Güth JF Br Dent J; 2019 Jan; 226(2):101-108. PubMed ID: 30679852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting. Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report. Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Keys to achieving successful restoratively-driven implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guide: A technical note. Turkyilmaz I J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 120(5):462-466. PubMed ID: 30910764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new twist on surgical guides. Bavar T J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 19133487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Manufacturing Technique on the Accuracy of Surgical Guides for Static Computer-Aided Implant Surgery. Abduo J; Lau D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(5):931-938. PubMed ID: 32991643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants. Ganz SD Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):265-90. PubMed ID: 25835793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Research on computer-aided technology of surgical guide for dental implant]. Wu T; Liao W; Dai N; Wang P; Chen N Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21485172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]