184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31593966)
1. Comparison of the Efficacy of Sediment Cytology over Oral Brush Cytology in Oral Leukoplakia.
Hosmani JV; Pujari VK; Kotrashetti VS; Nayak RS; Babji DV; Patanshetti SM
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(4):368-374. PubMed ID: 31593966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of spatula and cytobrush cytological techniques in early detection of oral malignant and premalignant lesions: a prospective and blinded study.
Nanayakkara PG; Dissanayaka WL; Nanayakkara BG; Amaratunga EA; Tilakaratne WM
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Apr; 45(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 26403502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Liquid-based oral brush cytology in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia using a modified Bethesda Cytology system.
Alsarraf A; Kujan O; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2018 Oct; 47(9):887-894. PubMed ID: 29957892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of oral brush cytology cell block immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Kujan O; Idrees M; Anand N; Soh B; Wong E; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2021 May; 50(5):451-458. PubMed ID: 33368584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology of oral brush biopsies: a randomized controlled trial.
Olms C; Hix N; Neumann H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Remmerbach TW
Head Face Med; 2018 May; 14(1):9. PubMed ID: 29843756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral rinse-based cytology and conventional exfoliative cytology: a comparative study.
Mulki S; Shetty P; Pai P
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 25879350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Usefulness of oral exfoliative cytology for the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma].
Navone R; Marsico A; Reale I; Pich A; Broccoletti R; Pentenero M; Gandolfo S
Minerva Stomatol; 2004 Mar; 53(3):77-86. PubMed ID: 15107778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sediment cytology in diagnostic evaluation of oral neoplasms.
Chaudhari VV; Dandekar R; Mahajan AM; Prakash N
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 24992841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, blinded comparison of cytology and DNA-image cytometry of brush biopsies for early detection of oral malignancy.
Kämmerer PW; Koch FP; Santoro M; Babaryka G; Biesterfeld S; Brieger J; Kunkel M
Oral Oncol; 2013 May; 49(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 23318121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytology of the oral cavity: a re-evaluation.
Navone R
Pathologica; 2009 Feb; 101(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 19771764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of oral rinse-based cytology and conventional exfoliative cytology: A pilot study.
Pereira T; Kesarkar K; Tamgadge A; Bhalerao S; Shetty S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):921-925. PubMed ID: 30197326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oral brush biopsy using liquid-based cytology is a reliable tool for oral cancer screening: A cost-utility analysis: Oral brush biopsy for oral cancer screening.
Idrees M; Farah CS; Sloan P; Kujan O
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Sep; 130(9):740-748. PubMed ID: 35704619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma.
Navone R; Burlo P; Pich A; Pentenero M; Broccoletti R; Marsico A; Gandolfo S
Cytopathology; 2007 Dec; 18(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 18031448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions.
Hayama FH; Motta AC; Silva Ade P; Migliari DA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005; 10(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15735543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of brush biopsy findings and salivary LDH levels in oral mucosal lesions of tobacco users.
Davidson SP; Kumar S; Somasundaram E; Jaishankar S
Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(2):191-195. PubMed ID: 37787211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The utility of oral brush cytology in the early detection of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review.
H Alsarraf A; Kujan O; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2018 Feb; 47(2):104-116. PubMed ID: 29130527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of brush biopsy-based cytology for the early detection of oral cancer and precursors in Fanconi anemia.
Velleuer E; Dietrich R; Pomjanski N; de Santana Almeida Araujo IK; Silva de Araujo BE; Sroka I; Biesterfeld S; Böcking A; Schramm M
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jun; 128(6):403-413. PubMed ID: 32022466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Diagnostic Role of Methyl Green-Pyronin Y Staining in Oral Leukoplakia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Exfoliative Cytology-Based Cytomorphometric Analysis.
Raman RK; Kamboj M; Narwal A
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(5):401-410. PubMed ID: 31112943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral Brush Liquid-Based Cytology: A Study of Concordance between a Cytotechnologist and a Cytopathologist.
Pandey P; Agarwal S; Ralli M; Dixit A; Singh D
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(2):121-129. PubMed ID: 29402796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytomorphometric analysis of oral submucous fibrosis and leukoplakia using methyl green-pyronin Y, Feulgen staining and exfoliative brush cytology.
Metgud R; Gupta K; Prasad U; Gupta J
Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jan; 90(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 24867495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
