These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31594513)

  • 21. Multisensory modalities increase working memory for mating signals in a treefrog.
    Zhu B; Zhou Y; Yang Y; Deng K; Wang T; Wang J; Tang Y; Ryan MJ; Cui J
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jun; 90(6):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 33666233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Covariation among multimodal components in the courtship display of the túngara frog.
    James LS; Halfwerk W; Hunter KL; Page RA; Taylor RC; Wilson PS; Ryan MJ
    J Exp Biol; 2021 Jun; 224(12):. PubMed ID: 34142696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Arginine vasotocin affects vocal behavior but not selective responses to conspecific calls in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Goutte S; Ryan MJ
    Horm Behav; 2021 Feb; 128():104891. PubMed ID: 33197465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eavesdropping Micropredators as Dynamic Limiters of Sexual Signal Elaboration and Intrasexual Competition.
    Leavell BC; Beaty LE; McNickle GG; Bernal XE
    Am Nat; 2022 May; 199(5):653-665. PubMed ID: 35472015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
    Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
    Emerson SB; Boyd SK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.
    Halfwerk W; Jones PL; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA
    Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6169):413-6. PubMed ID: 24458640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.
    Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 20206525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tactics of evasion: strategies used by signallers to deter eavesdropping enemies from exploiting communication systems.
    Bernal XE; Page RA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Feb; 98(1):222-242. PubMed ID: 36176190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Complex and transitive synchronization in a frustrated system of calling frogs.
    Aihara I; Takeda R; Mizumoto T; Otsuka T; Takahashi T; Okuno HG; Aihara K
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Mar; 83(3 Pt 1):031913. PubMed ID: 21517531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
    Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of geographic heterogeneity in predation pressure on sexual signal divergence in an Amazonian frog species complex.
    Trillo PA; Athanas KA; Goldhill DH; Hoke KL; Funk WC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23181745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of estradiol on neural responses to social signals in female túngara frogs.
    Chakraborty M; Burmeister SS
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Nov; 218(Pt 22):3671-7. PubMed ID: 26449971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.
    Baugh AT; Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(26):8985-8. PubMed ID: 18577592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sexual hearing: the influence of sex hormones on acoustic communication in frogs.
    Arch VS; Narins PM
    Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 252(1-2):15-20. PubMed ID: 19272318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental conditions limit attractiveness of a complex sexual signal in the túngara frog.
    Halfwerk W; Smit JAH; Loning H; Lea AM; Geipel I; Ellers J; Ryan MJ
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):1891. PubMed ID: 29192162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vocal communication in frogs.
    Kelley DB
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 15582379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of communication behaviour: receiver ontogeny in Túngara frogs and a prospectus for a behavioural evolutionary development.
    Baugh AT; Hoke KL; Ryan MJ
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():680632. PubMed ID: 22649307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.