These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31595299)

  • 1. Preference for Deliberation and Perceived Usefulness of Standard- and Narrative-Style Leaflet Designs: Implications for Equitable Cancer-Screening Communication.
    Robb KA; Gatting LP; von Wagner C; McGregor LM
    Ann Behav Med; 2020 Feb; 54(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 31595299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.
    Smith SG; Wardle J; Atkin W; Raine R; McGregor LM; Vart G; Morris S; Duffy SW; Moss S; Hackshaw A; Halloran S; Kralj-Hans I; Howe R; Snowball J; Handley G; Logan RF; Rainbow S; Smith S; Thomas M; Counsell N; von Wagner C
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):543. PubMed ID: 28806955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thinking Style as a Predictor of Men's Participation in Cancer Screening.
    McGuiness CE; Turnbull D; Wilson C; Duncan A; Flight IH; Zajac I
    Am J Mens Health; 2017 Mar; 11(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 27923966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style.
    Ghanouni A; Renzi C; Waller J
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Apr; 17(1):327. PubMed ID: 28420378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personalization of Conversational Agent-Patient Interaction Styles for Chronic Disease Management: Two Consecutive Cross-sectional Questionnaire Studies.
    Gross C; Schachner T; Hasl A; Kohlbrenner D; Clarenbach CF; Wangenheim FV; Kowatsch T
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 May; 23(5):e26643. PubMed ID: 33913814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum.
    Brosnan M; Ashwin C
    Autism; 2023 Jul; 27(5):1245-1255. PubMed ID: 36325717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.
    Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
    BMC Psychol; 2020 Feb; 8(1):11. PubMed ID: 32014059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability of a standalone written leaflet for the National Health Service for England Targeted Lung Health Check Programme: A concurrent, think-aloud study.
    Jallow M; Black G; van Os S; Baldwin DR; Brain KE; Donnelly M; Janes SM; Kurtidu C; McCutchan G; Robb KA; Ruparel M; Quaife SL
    Health Expect; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1776-1788. PubMed ID: 35475542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In the eye of the beholder: Decision-making of lawyers in cases of sexual harassment.
    Zvi L; Shechory-Bitton M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272606. PubMed ID: 35951515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.
    Christy SM; Monahan PO; Stump TE; Rawl SM; Champion VL
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31814511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.
    Smith SK; Simpson JM; Trevena LJ; McCaffery KJ
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):756-72. PubMed ID: 24421292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet.
    Smith SG; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 24007765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The adaptive decision-making, risky decision, and decision-making style of Internet gaming disorder.
    Ko CH; Wang PW; Liu TL; Chen CS; Yen CF; Yen JY
    Eur Psychiatry; 2017 Jul; 44():189-197. PubMed ID: 28646731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of Evidence-Based Risk Information on "Informed Choice" in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Randomised Controlled Trial].
    Steckelberg A; Haastert B; Hülfenhaus C; Mühlhauser I
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77 Suppl 1():S93-4. PubMed ID: 23553186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.
    Hay JL; Ramos M; Li Y; Holland S; Brennessel D; Kemeny MM
    J Behav Med; 2016 Feb; 39(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26280754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferences for Disease-Related Education and Support Among Younger People With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Ackerman IN; Bucknill A; Page RS; Broughton NS; Roberts C; Cavka B; Schoch P; Brand CA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2017 Apr; 69(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 27273912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplementing factual information with patient narratives in the cancer screening context: a qualitative study of acceptability and preferences.
    Bennett KF; von Wagner C; Robb KA
    Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):2032-41. PubMed ID: 25728262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing fluency effect of a leaflet for breast and cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled study in Japan.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Goto E; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Psychol Health Med; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 30101600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low literacy and written drug information: information-seeking, leaflet evaluation and preferences, and roles for images.
    van Beusekom MM; Grootens-Wiegers P; Bos MJ; Guchelaar HJ; van den Broek JM
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Dec; 38(6):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 27655308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.