140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31595344)
1. Combination of natural antimicrobials for contamination control in ethanol production.
Maia NJL; Corrêa JAF; Rigotti RT; da Silva Junior AA; Luciano FB
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Oct; 35(10):158. PubMed ID: 31595344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nisin incorporation enhances the inactivation of lactic acid bacteria during the acid wash step of bioethanol production from sugarcane juice.
Zhang L; Holle MJ; Kim JS; Daum MA; Miller MJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 69(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 31004511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Lactobacillus fermentum-Dekkera bruxellensis and feedstock on fuel ethanol fermentation.
Bassi APG; Meneguello L; Paraluppi AL; Sanches BCP; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1661-1672. PubMed ID: 29488182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of nisin in fuel ethanol production with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Peng J; Zhang L; Gu ZH; Ding ZY; Shi GY
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2012 Aug; 55(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 22691226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the use of natural antimicrobial agents and pulsed electric fields to control spoilage bacteria during a beer production process.
Galvagno MA; Gil GR; Iannone LJ; Cerrutti P
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2007; 39(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 17987854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative antimicrobial compounds to control potential Lactobacillus contamination in bioethanol fermentations.
Limayem A; Hanning IB; Muthaiyan A; Illeghems K; Kim JW; Crandall PG; O'Bryan CA; Ricke SC
J Environ Sci Health B; 2011; 46(8):709-14. PubMed ID: 21879832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethanol addition enhances acid treatment to eliminate Lactobacillus fermentum from the fermentation process for fuel ethanol production.
Costa MAS; Cerri BC; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 66(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29108112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of contamination with Lactobacillus fermentum I2 on ethanol production by Spathaspora passalidarum.
Collograi KC; da Costa AC; Ienczak JL
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Jun; 103(12):5039-5050. PubMed ID: 30989252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation.
Bischoff KM; Liu S; Leathers TD; Worthington RE; Rich JO
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2009 May; 103(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 19148876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sugarcane must fed-batch fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: impact of sterilized and non-sterilized sugarcane must.
Bonatelli ML; Ienczak JL; Labate CA
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2019 Aug; 112(8):1177-1187. PubMed ID: 30830509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using drug-loaded pH-responsive poly(4-vinylpyridine) microspheres as a new strategy for intelligent controlling of Lactobacillus plantarum contamination in bioethanol fermentation.
Li M; Hu HW; Chen Z; Zhang YX; Li H
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Sep; 34(10):146. PubMed ID: 30206729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of major inhibitory compounds from sugarcane-based lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the physiology of yeast strains and lactic acid bacteria.
Cola P; Procópio DP; Alves ATC; Carnevalli LR; Sampaio IV; da Costa BLV; Basso TO
Biotechnol Lett; 2020 Apr; 42(4):571-582. PubMed ID: 31974646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening of lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains to select adapted anti-fungal co-cultures for cocoa bean fermentation.
Romanens E; Freimüller Leischtfeld S; Volland A; Stevens MJA; Krähenmann U; Isele D; Fischer B; Meile L; Miescher Schwenninger S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 290():262-272. PubMed ID: 30408647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of lactic acid bacteria on cocoa bean fermentation.
Ho VT; Zhao J; Fleet G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Jul; 205():54-67. PubMed ID: 25889523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Yeast Derived LysA2 Can Control Bacterial Contamination in Ethanol Fermentation.
Kim JS; Daum MA; Jin YS; Miller MJ
Viruses; 2018 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 29795003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antimicrobial activity of nisin against Oenococcus oeni and other wine bacteria.
Rojo-Bezares B; Sáenz Y; Zarazaga M; Torres C; Ruiz-Larrea F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 17320991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandarin essential oil as an antimicrobial in ethanolic fermentation: Effects on Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Varano A; Shirahigue LD; Azevedo FA; Altenhofen da Silva M; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2022 Jun; 74(6):981-991. PubMed ID: 35247276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Homo- and heterofermentative lactobacilli differently affect sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
Basso TO; Gomes FS; Lopes ML; de Amorim HV; Eggleston G; Basso LC
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2014 Jan; 105(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 24198118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biofilm formation and antimicrobial sensitivity of lactobacilli contaminants from sugarcane-based fuel ethanol fermentation.
Dellias MTF; Borges CD; Lopes ML; da Cruz SH; de Amorim HV; Tsai SM
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2018 Sep; 111(9):1631-1644. PubMed ID: 29478220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.
Ceccato-Antonini SR
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 May; 34(6):80. PubMed ID: 29802468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
