372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31595801)
1. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?
Madbouly K; Sheir KZ; Elsobky E
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1415-8. PubMed ID: 11342888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).
Mustafa M
Urol Res; 2012 Aug; 40(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 21847556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of lower pole anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
Juan YS; Chuang SM; Wu WJ; Shen JT; Wang CJ; Huang CH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2005 Aug; 21(8):358-64. PubMed ID: 16158878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
Perks AE; Schuler TD; Lee J; Ghiculete D; Chung DG; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 18674803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of pelvicaliceal features on problematic lower pole stone clearance in different age groups.
Gurocak S; Kupeli B; Acar C; Tan MO; Karaoglan U; Bozkirli I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 17619163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network.
Poulakis V; Dahm P; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Remplik J; Becht E
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1250-6. PubMed ID: 12629337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?
Sorensen CM; Chandhoke PS
J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. PubMed ID: 12441921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clearance of lower-pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle.
Keeley FX; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):371-5. PubMed ID: 10516444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Ruggera L; Beltrami P; Ballario R; Cavalleri S; Cazzoletti L; Artibani W
Int J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 15985072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
