These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31596481)

  • 61. Globally Relaxed Selection and Local Adaptation in Boechera stricta.
    Liang YY; Chen XY; Zhou BF; Mitchell-Olds T; Wang B
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 35349686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Genetic differences between humans and great apes.
    Gagneux P; Varki A
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2001 Jan; 18(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 11161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. More effective purifying selection on RNA viruses than in DNA viruses.
    Hughes AL; Hughes MA
    Gene; 2007 Dec; 404(1-2):117-25. PubMed ID: 17928171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Purifying selection in mammalian mitochondrial protein-coding genes is highly effective and congruent with evolution of nuclear genes.
    Popadin KY; Nikolaev SI; Junier T; Baranova M; Antonarakis SE
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 22983951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The Time Scale of Recombination Rate Evolution in Great Apes.
    Stevison LS; Woerner AE; Kidd JM; Kelley JL; Veeramah KR; McManus KF; ; Bustamante CD; Hammer MF; Wall JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Apr; 33(4):928-45. PubMed ID: 26671457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Micro-scale signature of purifying selection in Marburg virus genomes.
    Hughes AL
    Gene; 2007 May; 392(1-2):266-72. PubMed ID: 17306473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A quantitative genetic model of background selection in humans.
    Buffalo V; Kern AD
    PLoS Genet; 2024 Mar; 20(3):e1011144. PubMed ID: 38507461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Natural Selection in the Great Apes.
    Cagan A; Theunert C; Laayouni H; Santpere G; Pybus M; Casals F; Prüfer K; Navarro A; Marques-Bonet T; Bertranpetit J; Andrés AM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):3268-3283. PubMed ID: 27795229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The relations between recombination rate and patterns of molecular variation and evolution in Drosophila.
    Charlesworth B; Campos JL
    Annu Rev Genet; 2014; 48():383-403. PubMed ID: 25251853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Natural Selection and Recombination Rate Variation Shape Nucleotide Polymorphism Across the Genomes of Three Related Populus Species.
    Wang J; Street NR; Scofield DG; Ingvarsson PK
    Genetics; 2016 Mar; 202(3):1185-200. PubMed ID: 26721855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.
    Comeron JM
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jun; 10(6):e1004434. PubMed ID: 24968283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Nucleotide substitutions in dengue virus serotypes from Asian and American countries: insights into intracodon recombination and purifying selection.
    Behura SK; Severson DW
    BMC Microbiol; 2013 Feb; 13():37. PubMed ID: 23410119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Reduced representation genome sequencing suggests low diversity on the sex chromosomes of tonkean macaque monkeys.
    Evans BJ; Zeng K; Esselstyn JA; Charlesworth B; Melnick DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Sep; 31(9):2425-40. PubMed ID: 24987106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Natural Selection and Functional Potentials of Human Noncoding Elements Revealed by Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data.
    Jha P; Lu D; Xu S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129023. PubMed ID: 26053627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A coalescent model of background selection with recombination, demography and variation in selection coefficients.
    Zeng K
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Apr; 110(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 23188176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Limited role of generation time changes in driving the evolution of the mutation spectrum in humans.
    Gao Z; Zhang Y; Cramer N; Przeworski M; Moorjani P
    Elife; 2023 Feb; 12():. PubMed ID: 36779395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Direct Estimate of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate Uncovers the Effects of Drift and Recombination in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Plastid Genome.
    Ness RW; Kraemer SA; Colegrave N; Keightley PD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Mar; 33(3):800-8. PubMed ID: 26615203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Population genetic models of GERP scores suggest pervasive turnover of constrained sites across mammalian evolution.
    Huber CD; Kim BY; Lohmueller KE
    PLoS Genet; 2020 May; 16(5):e1008827. PubMed ID: 32469868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. MC1R diversity in Northern Island Melanesia has not been constrained by strong purifying selection and cannot explain pigmentation phenotype variation in the region.
    Norton HL; Werren E; Friedlaender J
    BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():122. PubMed ID: 26482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Transcription-related mutations and GC content drive variation in nucleotide substitution rates across the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata.
    DeRose-Wilson LJ; Gaut BS
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Apr; 7():66. PubMed ID: 17451608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.