These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31596645)

  • 1. Degree of Hearing Loss Affects Bilateral Hearing Aid Benefits in Ecologically Relevant Laboratory Conditions.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM; Shehorn J; Dittberner AB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3834-3850. PubMed ID: 31596645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.
    Chen X; You Y; Yang J; Qian J; Lu Q; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; Liu B; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):524-533. PubMed ID: 32441563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.
    Dwyer NY; Firszt JB; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 24084062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.
    Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Cowdrey L; King S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 22441359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.
    van Schoonhoven J; Schulte M; Boymans M; Wagener KC; Dreschler WA; Kollmeier B
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jul; 20():. PubMed ID: 27460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 23231817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Yoon YS; Li Y; Kang HY; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):554-65. PubMed ID: 21696329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.
    Brody L; Wu YH; Stangl E
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 30458521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.