These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31597583)

  • 21. Optimum contribution selection for animal breeding and conservation: the R package optiSel.
    Wellmann R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):25. PubMed ID: 30642239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.
    Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2021-32. PubMed ID: 16100056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic mating as sustainable breeding for Chinese indigenous Ningxiang pigs.
    He J; Wu XL; Zeng Q; Li H; Ma H; Jiang J; Rosa GJM; Gianola D; Tait RG; Bauck S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236629. PubMed ID: 32797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The benefit of native uniqueness in a local red cattle breed from Northern Germany.
    Schäler J; Hinrichs D; Thaller G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Nov; 136(6):518-525. PubMed ID: 31215697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating inbreeding rate and effective population size in the Finnish Ayrshire population in the era of genomic selection.
    Sarviaho K; Uimari P; Martikainen K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 36808142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. There is room for selection in a small local pig breed when using optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Gourdine JL; Sørensen AC; Rydhmer L
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Jan; 90(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 21841085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short communication: Lethal mutations in Vorderwald cattle through Montbéliarde incrossings.
    Reinartz S; Distl O
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):613-618. PubMed ID: 31733870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 11929623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short- and long-term consequences of collaboration between Northern European Red dairy and dual-purpose cattle.
    Schmidtmann C; Slagboom M; Sørensen AC; Hinrichs D; Thaller G; Kargo M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Jul; 139(4):447-461. PubMed ID: 35187742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trends in genetic diversity and the effect of inbreeding in American Angus cattle under genomic selection.
    Lozada-Soto EA; Maltecca C; Lu D; Miller S; Cole JB; Tiezzi F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Jun; 53(1):50. PubMed ID: 34134619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.