These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31597803)

  • 1. Influence of Cavity Pretreatments on the Fracture Resistance of Premolars with Self-adhesive Cemented Composite Inlay.
    Shafiei F; Jowkar Z; Hosseini N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):828-833. PubMed ID: 31597803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
    Shafiei F; Alavi AA; Karimi F; Ansarifard E
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
    Habekost Lde V; Camacho GB; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Pretreatment and Activation Mode on the Interfacial Adaptation of Nanoceramic Resin Inlay and Self-adhesive Resin Cement.
    Han SH; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tagami J; Kum KY; Park SH
    Dent Mater; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1170-1182. PubMed ID: 32536587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of proanthocyanidin mediated immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the strength of premolars restored with composite resin inlay.
    Shafiei F; Aghaei T; Jowkar Z
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Mar; 12(3):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 32190193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems.
    Sun YS; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 18578176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of operator skill on the dentin bonding ability of a self-adhesive resin cement after different adhesive treatments.
    Shafiei F; Fattah Z; Barati S
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(5):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 31454330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture strength of minimally prepared resin bonded CEREC inlays.
    Tsitrou E; Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Pahinis K; van Noort R
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 19830967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of various resin cements and immediate dentin sealing on tooth fracture resistance of zirconia inlay restorations.
    Iketani Y; Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
    Am J Dent; 2021 Aug; 34(4):179-185. PubMed ID: 34370908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations.
    van den Breemer CRG; Özcan M; Cune MS; van der Giezen R; Kerdijk W; Gresnigt MMM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Aug; 72():102-109. PubMed ID: 28477520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.