These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Intermediate fenestrations reduce flow reversal in a silicone model of Stanford Type B aortic dissection. Birjiniuk J; Veeraswamy RK; Oshinski JN; Ku DN J Biomech; 2019 Aug; 93():101-110. PubMed ID: 31326118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic dissection assessment by 4D phase-contrast MRI with hemodynamic parameters: the impact of stent type. Chen CW; Tseng YH; Lin CC; Kao CC; Wong MY; Ting H; Huang YK Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Feb; 11(2):490-501. PubMed ID: 33532250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Entry tear hemodynamics using 4D flow MRI in a patient with acute type B aortic dissection. Liu SZ; Engel JS; Bisen JB; Kilinc O; Quinn S; Hoel AW; Mehta CK; Markl M; Allen BD Radiol Case Rep; 2023 Mar; 18(3):1037-1040. PubMed ID: 36684636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for visualization and quantification of endovascular aortic prosthesis, their endoleaks and aneurysm sacs at 1.5 T. Salehi Ravesh M; Langguth P; Pfarr JA; Schupp J; Trentmann J; Koktzoglou I; Edelman RR; Graessner J; Greiser A; Hautemann D; Hennemuth A; Both M; Jansen O; Hövener JB; Schäfer JP Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():164-172. PubMed ID: 31075419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 4D flow MRI assessment of extracranial-intracranial bypass: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the hemodynamics. Sekine T; Takagi R; Amano Y; Murai Y; Orita E; Matsumura Y; Kumita S Neuroradiology; 2016 Mar; 58(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 26631076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. Vertinsky AT; Schwartz NE; Fischbein NJ; Rosenberg J; Albers GW; Zaharchuk G AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1753-60. PubMed ID: 18635617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of 3D-CTA and 4D-CE-MRA for the dynamic monitoring of angiogenesis in a rabbit VX2 tumor. Wang H; Zheng LF; Feng Y; Xie XQ; Zhao JL; Wang XF; Zhang GX Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 20413238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic Disturbances in Posterior Circulation Stroke: 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Added to Computed Tomography Angiography. Malm J; Birnefeld J; Zarrinkoob L; Wåhlin A; Eklund A Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():656769. PubMed ID: 34658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Could four-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound replace computed tomography angiography during follow up of fenestrated endografts? Results of a preliminary experience. Gargiulo M; Gallitto E; Serra C; Freyrie A; Mascoli C; Bianchini Massoni C; De Matteis M; De Molo C; Stella A Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 48(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 25023904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four-dimensional phase-contrast vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (4D PC-VIPR) MR evaluation of the renal arteries in transplant recipients: Preliminary results. Motoyama D; Ishii Y; Takehara Y; Sugiyama M; Yang W; Nasu H; Ushio T; Hirose Y; Ohishi N; Wakayama T; Kabasawa H; Johnson K; Wieben O; Sakahara H; Ozono S J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):595-603. PubMed ID: 28152259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of ferumoxytol-enhanced neonatal and young infant cardiac MRI without general anesthesia. Lai LM; Cheng JY; Alley MT; Zhang T; Lustig M; Vasanawala SS J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1407-1418. PubMed ID: 27678106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T. Strecker C; Harloff A; Wallis W; Markl M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1097-103. PubMed ID: 22745007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-procedural assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparison of a non-contrast 3D MRA protocol with contrast-enhanced cardiac dual-source CT angiography. Ruile P; Blanke P; Krauss T; Dorfs S; Jung B; Jander N; Leipsic J; Langer M; Neumann FJ; Pache G Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 17(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 26219296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging detection of cerebral artery fenestrations and their clinical correlation with cerebrovascular diseases. Wu X; Chen X; Zhu J; Chen Q; Li Z; Lin A Clin Imaging; 2020 Jun; 62():57-62. PubMed ID: 32066034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [3D-CTA and 4D-CE-MRA for dynamic monitoring tumor angiogenesis in a rabbit VX2 tumor]. Wang H; Zhang GX; Feng Y; Zhang F; Wang XF; Shen C Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 May; 90(19):1337-41. PubMed ID: 20646584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT. Pamminger M; Klug G; Kranewitter C; Reindl M; Reinstadler SJ; Henninger B; Tiller C; Holzknecht M; Kremser C; Bauer A; Jaschke W; Metzler B; Mayr A Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4847-4856. PubMed ID: 32318849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of CTA and MRI/MRA in the evaluation of the cortical venous reflux in the intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula DAVF. Lin YH; Wang YF; Liu HM; Lee CW; Chen YF; Hsieh HJ Neuroradiology; 2018 Jan; 60(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29188304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance coronary angiography: are you ready? Gaylord GM Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 12229053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]