BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599443)

  • 1. Analysis of machine learning algorithms as integrative tools for validation of next generation sequencing data.
    Marceddu G; Dallavilla T; Guerri G; Zulian A; Marinelli C; Bertelli M
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(18):8139-8147. PubMed ID: 31599443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
    van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
    Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sanger Confirmation Is Required to Achieve Optimal Sensitivity and Specificity in Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Testing.
    Mu W; Lu HM; Chen J; Li S; Elliott AM
    J Mol Diagn; 2016 Nov; 18(6):923-932. PubMed ID: 27720647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Rigorous Interlaboratory Examination of the Need to Confirm Next-Generation Sequencing-Detected Variants with an Orthogonal Method in Clinical Genetic Testing.
    Lincoln SE; Truty R; Lin CF; Zook JM; Paul J; Ramey VH; Salit M; Rehm HL; Nussbaum RL; Lebo MS
    J Mol Diagn; 2019 Mar; 21(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 30610921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants.
    Beck TF; Mullikin JC; ; Biesecker LG
    Clin Chem; 2016 Apr; 62(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 26847218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Software-Assisted Manual Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Data: An Alternative to Routine Sanger Sequencing Confirmation with Equivalent Results in >15,000 Germline DNA Screens.
    Muzzey D; Kash S; Johnson JI; Melroy LM; Kaleta P; Pierce KA; Ready K; Kang HP; Haas KR
    J Mol Diagn; 2019 Mar; 21(2):296-306. PubMed ID: 30529126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confirming Variants in Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Testing by Sanger Sequencing.
    Baudhuin LM; Lagerstedt SA; Klee EW; Fadra N; Oglesbee D; Ferber MJ
    J Mol Diagn; 2015 Jul; 17(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 25960255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive assessment of Next-Generation Sequencing variants validation using a secondary technology.
    Zheng J; Zhang H; Banerjee S; Li Y; Zhou J; Yang Q; Tan X; Han P; Fu Q; Cui X; Yuan Y; Zhang M; Shen R; Song H; Zhang X; Zhao L; Peng Z; Wang W; Yin Y
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2019 Jul; 7(7):e00748. PubMed ID: 31165590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Ion Torrent PGM sequencing workflow for the routine rapid detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations.
    Zanella I; Merola F; Biasiotto G; Archetti S; Spinelli E; Di Lorenzo D
    Exp Mol Pathol; 2017 Apr; 102(2):314-320. PubMed ID: 28263838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sanger Validation of High-Throughput Sequencing in Genetic Diagnosis: Still the Best Practice?
    De Cario R; Kura A; Suraci S; Magi A; Volta A; Marcucci R; Gori AM; Pepe G; Giusti B; Sticchi E
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():592588. PubMed ID: 33343633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance comparison: exome sequencing as a single test replacing Sanger sequencing.
    Fridman H; Bormans C; Einhorn M; Au D; Bormans A; Porat Y; Sanchez LF; Manning B; Levy-Lahad E; Behar DM
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 May; 296(3):653-663. PubMed ID: 33694043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MAC-ErrorReads: machine learning-assisted classifier for filtering erroneous NGS reads.
    Sami A; El-Metwally S; Rashad MZ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):61. PubMed ID: 38321434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concordance and reproducibility of a next generation mtGenome sequencing method for high-quality samples using the Illumina MiSeq.
    Peck MA; Brandhagen MD; Marshall C; Diegoli TM; Irwin JA; Sturk-Andreaggi K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():103-111. PubMed ID: 27368088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
    Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Machine Learning to Identify True Somatic Variants from Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Wu C; Zhao X; Welsh M; Costello K; Cao K; Abou Tayoun A; Li M; Sarmady M
    Clin Chem; 2020 Jan; 66(1):239-246. PubMed ID: 31672855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthogonal NGS for High Throughput Clinical Diagnostics.
    Chennagiri N; White EJ; Frieden A; Lopez E; Lieber DS; Nikiforov A; Ross T; Batorsky R; Hansen S; Lip V; Luquette LJ; Mauceli E; Margulies D; Milos PM; Napolitano N; Nizzari MM; Yu T; Thompson JF
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24650. PubMed ID: 27090146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sanger sequencing is no longer always necessary based on a single-center validation of 1109 NGS variants in 825 clinical exomes.
    Arteche-López A; Ávila-Fernández A; Romero R; Riveiro-Álvarez R; López-Martínez MA; Giménez-Pardo A; Vélez-Monsalve C; Gallego-Merlo J; García-Vara I; Almoguera B; Bustamante-Aragonés A; Blanco-Kelly F; Tahsin-Swafiri S; Rodríguez-Pinilla E; Minguez P; Lorda I; Trujillo-Tiebas MJ; Ayuso C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5697. PubMed ID: 33707547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ClinQC: a tool for quality control and cleaning of Sanger and NGS data in clinical research.
    Pandey RV; Pabinger S; Kriegner A; Weinhäusel A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():56. PubMed ID: 26830926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.