These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599615)

  • 1. The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies.
    Rosenbusch H; Wanders F; Pit IL
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 31599615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic measures: Using natural language processing to measure, differentiate, and describe psychological constructs.
    Kjell ONE; Kjell K; Garcia D; Sikström S
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):92-115. PubMed ID: 29963879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using semantic similarity to understand the psychological constructs related to prosociality.
    Evans AM; Rosenbusch H; Zeelenberg M
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44():226-230. PubMed ID: 34749239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using retest-adjusted correlations as indicators of the semantic similarity of items.
    Wood D; Lowman GH; Armstrong BF; Harms PD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Aug; 125(2):437-454. PubMed ID: 36201812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic network analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks.
    Christensen AP; Kenett YN
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Aug; 28(4):860-879. PubMed ID: 34941329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap.
    Crossley SA; Kyle K; Dascalu M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 30298264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selecting response anchors with equal intervals for summated rating scales.
    Casper WC; Edwards BD; Wallace JC; Landis RS; Fife DA
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Apr; 105(4):390-409. PubMed ID: 31414829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the construct validity of affective judgments of physical activity measures.
    Chmielewski M; Sala M; Tang R; Baldwin A
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1128-41. PubMed ID: 27537007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enter sandman: Compound processing and semantic transparency in a compositional perspective.
    Günther F; Marelli M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1872-1882. PubMed ID: 30570322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Walking across Wikipedia: a scale-free network model of semantic memory retrieval.
    Thompson GW; Kello CT
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():86. PubMed ID: 24575064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure at every scale: A semantic network account of the similarities between unrelated concepts.
    De Deyne S; Navarro DJ; Perfors A; Storms G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Sep; 145(9):1228-54. PubMed ID: 27560855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring positive psychosocial sequelae in patients with advanced cancer.
    Applebaum AJ; Marziliano A; Schofield E; Breitbart W; Rosenfeld B
    Psychol Trauma; 2021 Sep; 13(6):703-712. PubMed ID: 32881572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a reproducible interactome: semantic-based detection of redundancies to unify protein-protein interaction databases.
    Melkonian M; Juigné C; Dameron O; Rabut G; Becker E
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 38(6):1685-1691. PubMed ID: 35015827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High feature overlap and incidental encoding drive rapid semantic integration in the fast mapping paradigm.
    Zaiser AK; Meyer P; Bader R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jan; 151(1):97-120. PubMed ID: 34410804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corpus domain effects on distributional semantic modeling of medical terms.
    Pakhomov SV; Finley G; McEwan R; Wang Y; Melton GB
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 32(23):3635-3644. PubMed ID: 27531100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length.
    Kenett YN; Levi E; Anaki D; Faust M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1470-1489. PubMed ID: 28240936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: the semantic system.
    Goldberg TE; Aloia MS; Gourovitch ML; Missar D; Pickar D; Weinberger DR
    Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Dec; 155(12):1671-6. PubMed ID: 9842774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The semantic measures library and toolkit: fast computation of semantic similarity and relatedness using biomedical ontologies.
    Harispe S; Ranwez S; Janaqi S; Montmain J
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):740-2. PubMed ID: 24108186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
    Vachon F; Marsh JE; Labonté K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jul; 149(7):1360-1397. PubMed ID: 31750710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The failing measurement of attitudes: How semantic determinants of individual survey responses come to replace measures of attitude strength.
    Arnulf JK; Larsen KR; Martinsen ØL; Egeland T
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2345-2365. PubMed ID: 29330764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.