These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599635)

  • 1. A comparison of conflict diffusion models in the flanker task through pseudolikelihood Bayes factors.
    Evans NJ; Servant M
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Jan; 127(1):114-135. PubMed ID: 31599635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the Flanker Task.
    Servant M; Evans NJ
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Sep; 35(6):831-849. PubMed ID: 32658539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model-based approach to disentangling facilitation and interference effects in conflict tasks.
    Evans NJ; Servant M
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):1183-1209. PubMed ID: 35482645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model of dynamic, within-trial conflict resolution for decision making.
    Weichart ER; Turner BM; Sederberg PB
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):749-777. PubMed ID: 32212764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computational account of conflict processing during mental imagery.
    Wang M; Nie QY
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 24(5):816-838. PubMed ID: 39085587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermodynamic integration via differential evolution: A method for estimating marginal likelihoods.
    Evans NJ; Annis J
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):930-947. PubMed ID: 30604038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Lee PS; Sewell DK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. flankr: An R package implementing computational models of attentional selectivity.
    Grange JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):528-41. PubMed ID: 26174713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.
    Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1448-1469. PubMed ID: 34591554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study.
    White CN; Servant M; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):286-301. PubMed ID: 28357629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions.
    Ulrich R; Schröter H; Leuthold H; Birngruber T
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():148-74. PubMed ID: 25909766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive control across adolescence: Dynamic adjustments and mind-wandering.
    Gyurkovics M; Stafford T; Levita L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1017-1031. PubMed ID: 31599622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamics of attentional selection under conflict: toward a rational Bayesian account.
    Yu AJ; Dayan P; Cohen JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):700-17. PubMed ID: 19485686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-triggered task conflict affects task-selection errors in task switching: A Bayesian multinomial processing tree modeling approach.
    Moretti L; Koch I; Steinhauser M; Schuch S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Feb; 50(2):230-243. PubMed ID: 37155281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task.
    Kalanthroff E; Davelaar EJ; Henik A; Goldfarb L; Usher M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 29035077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1505-32. PubMed ID: 27149295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
    Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.