BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599685)

  • 1. Estimating Demand for Germline Genome Editing: An
    Viotti M; Victor AR; Griffin DK; Groob JS; Brake AJ; Zouves CG; Barnes FL
    CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):304-315. PubMed ID: 31599685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Germline genome editing versus preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Is there a case in favour of germline interventions?
    Ranisch R
    Bioethics; 2020 Jan; 34(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 31448423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are we ready for genome editing in human embryos for clinical purposes?
    Harper JC; Schatten G
    Eur J Med Genet; 2019 Aug; 62(8):103682. PubMed ID: 31150829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?
    Cavaliere G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28725950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Polygenic scores: towards designer babies?].
    Jordan B
    Med Sci (Paris); 2020 Mar; 36(3):289-291. PubMed ID: 32228853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
    V Hammerstein AL; Eggel M; Biller-Andorno N
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 31752935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety of Germline Genome Editing for Genetically Related "Future" Children as Perceived by Parents.
    Ishii T; Beriain IM
    CRISPR J; 2019 Dec; 2(6):370-375. PubMed ID: 31746634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From regenerative medicine to human design: what are we really afraid of?
    Stock G
    Free Inq; 2004; 24(4):27-30. PubMed ID: 15835004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Case for Remedial Germline Editing-The Long-term View.
    Adashi EY; Cohen IG
    JAMA; 2020 May; 323(18):1762-1763. PubMed ID: 32396174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships.
    Rehmann-Sutter C
    New Bioeth; 2018 Apr; 24(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 29529985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human Germline Genome Editing: An Assessment.
    Greely HT
    CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):253-265. PubMed ID: 31599681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 'serious' factor in germline modification.
    Kleiderman E; Ravitsky V; Knoppers BM
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Aug; 45(8):508-513. PubMed ID: 31326898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries.
    Alon I; Urbanos-Garrido R; Guimón J
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Feb; 38(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 33405005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical view on using "life not worth living" in the bioethics of assisted reproduction.
    Kandlbinder AE
    Med Health Care Philos; 2024 Jun; 27(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 38363499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization.
    Araki M; Ishii T
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Nov; 12():108. PubMed ID: 25420886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating germline editing in assisted reproductive technology: An EU cross-disciplinary perspective.
    Nordberg A; Minssen T; Feeney O; de Miguel Beriain I; Galvagni L; Wartiovaara K
    Bioethics; 2020 Jan; 34(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 31877579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive medicine involving genome editing: clinical uncertainties and embryological needs.
    Ishii T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Jan; 34(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27743815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Future of Gene Editing - Toward Scientific and Social Consensus.
    Rosenbaum L
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):971-975. PubMed ID: 30649992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How will new genetic technologies, such as gene editing, change reproductive decision-making? Views of high-risk couples.
    van Dijke I; Lakeman P; Mathijssen IB; Goddijn M; Cornel MC; Henneman L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Jan; 29(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 32773775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.