These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599685)

  • 41. Reproductive rights.
    Meyer LH
    Ethical Perspect; 2003; 10(3-4):173-5. PubMed ID: 16206453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In Vitro Gametogenesis and the Creation of 'Designer Babies'.
    Segers S; Pennings G; Dondorp W; DE Wert G; Mertes H
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jul; 28(3):499-508. PubMed ID: 31298196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of scientific self-regulation for the control of genome editing in the human germline: The lessons from the Asilomar and the Napa meetings show how self-regulation and public deliberation can lead to regulation of new biotechnologies.
    Gregorowius D; Biller-Andorno N; Deplazes-Zemp A
    EMBO Rep; 2017 Mar; 18(3):355-358. PubMed ID: 28219901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Third party assisted conception: an African perspective.
    Tangwa GB
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 19067233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing: a review of the challenges.
    Hens K; Dondorp W; Handyside AH; Harper J; Newson AJ; Pennings G; Rehmann-Sutter C; de Wert G
    Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 23466750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the earliest form of prenatal diagnosis.
    Shahine LK; Caughey AB
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 60(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 15722632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Focusing on Human Rights: a framework for CRISPR germline genome editing ethics and regulation.
    Doxzen K; Halpern J
    Perspect Biol Med; 2020; 63(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 32063585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genetics experience impacts attitudes towards germline gene editing: a survey of over 1500 members of the public.
    Jedwab A; Vears DF; Tse C; Gyngell C
    J Hum Genet; 2020 Dec; 65(12):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 32737393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Mosaicism: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
    Vega M; Jindal S
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Jan; 34(1):11-13. PubMed ID: 27704231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The ethics of creating genetically modified children using genome editing.
    Ishii T
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2017 Dec; 24(6):418-423. PubMed ID: 28885275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing: Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.
    De Wert G; Heindryckx B; Pennings G; Clarke A; Eichenlaub-Ritter U; van El CG; Forzano F; Goddijn M; Howard HC; Radojkovic D; Rial-Sebbag E; Dondorp W; Tarlatzis BC; Cornel MC;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Apr; 26(4):450-470. PubMed ID: 29326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, stem cells and Jewish law.
    Broyde MJ
    Tradition; 2004; 38(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 15856576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?
    Krahn T
    Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Jun; 12(2):187-202. PubMed ID: 18979183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Gene Editing, Sexual Reproduction, and the Arts: The Present, the Future, and the Imagined.
    Buiani R
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1195():177. PubMed ID: 32468475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Heritable genome editing: ethical aspects of a developing domain.
    Segers S
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 38(11):2055-2061. PubMed ID: 37581898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Why we should not permit embryos to be selected as tissue donors.
    King D
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Aug; (190):13-6. PubMed ID: 14983868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. In vitro fertilisation: the science and the ethics in the 21st century.
    Kelly L
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2001; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 16639820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Eight Strategies to Engineer Acceptance of Human Germline Modifications.
    Khan S; Drabiak K
    J Bioeth Inq; 2024 Mar; 21(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 37523056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. 'Reprogenetics': hype, phobia and choice: an unreserved advocate of new reproductive technologies argues his case.
    Gillott J
    Conscience; 2003-2004 Winter; 24(4):10-4. PubMed ID: 16459388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ethical considerations in the field of assisted reproductive technology.
    Cobb LN; Ke RW
    Minerva Endocrinol; 2018 Mar; 43(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 28490169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.