378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599825)
41. Outcomes of Autologous Fascia Pubovaginal Sling for Patients with Transvaginal Mesh Related Complications Requiring Mesh Removal.
McCoy O; Vaughan T; Nickles SW; Ashley M; MacLachlan LS; Ginsberg D; Rovner E
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):484-9. PubMed ID: 26997314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of a mid-urethral synthetic mesh sling on long-term risk of systemic conditions in women with stress urinary incontinence: a national cohort study.
Muller P; Gurol-Urganci I; Thakar R; Ehrenstein MR; Van Der Meulen J; Jha S
BJOG; 2022 Mar; 129(4):664-670. PubMed ID: 34524725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Management of the Exposed or Perforated Midurethral Sling.
Giusto LL; Zahner PM; Goldman HB
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30466700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary and repeat midurethral sling procedures.
Parden AM; Gleason JL; Jauk V; Garner R; Ballard A; Richter HE
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):273-278. PubMed ID: 23344276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Schimpf MO; Rahn DD; Wheeler TL; Patel M; White AB; Orejuela FJ; El-Nashar SA; Margulies RU; Gleason JL; Aschkenazi SO; Mamik MM; Ward RM; Balk EM; Sung VW;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):71.e1-71.e27. PubMed ID: 24487005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of a Single-incision Sling Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Erickson T; Roovers JP; Gheiler E; Parekh M; Parva M; Hanson C; McCrery R; Tu LM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 32320798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Characterization of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Before and After Midurethral Sling Revision.
Parden AM; Tang Y; Szychowski J; Richter HE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):979-85. PubMed ID: 27393288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Synthetic Midurethral Slings: Roles, Outcomes, and Complications.
Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 30466699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Burch Retropubic Urethropexy Compared With Midurethral Sling With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Blandon RE; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Lemens MA; Gebhart JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 128(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 27607858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-incision mini-sling and transobturator midurethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 3-year follow-up results.
Pascom ALG; Djehdian LM; Bortolini MAT; Jarmy-Di Bella ZIK; Delroy CA; Tamanini JTN; Castro RA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2184-2190. PubMed ID: 30088679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mid-urethral sling revision for mesh exposure-long-term outcomes of two surgical techniques from a comparative clinical retrospective cohort study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Nikpoor P
BJOG; 2020 Jul; 127(8):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 32107882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Impact of Surgical Center Volume on Reoperation Risk after Mid Urethral Sling.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
J Urol; 2021 Dec; 206(6):1454-1460. PubMed ID: 34288737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Re: Long-Term Risk of Reoperation after Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Wein AJ
J Urol; 2020 Jun; 203(6):1066-1067. PubMed ID: 32186451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing Single-Incision Midurethral Sling with Bulking Agents for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Rationale for a Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Osse NJE; Schonewille MEA; Engberts MK; Blanker MH; Klerkx WM; van Eijndhoven HWF
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 36716732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors.
Jonsson Funk M; Siddiqui NY; Pate V; Amundsen CL; Wu JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 208(1):73.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23099189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Brennand EA; Wu G; Houlihan S; Globerman D; Gagnon LH; Birch C; Hyakutake M; Carlson KV; Al-Shankiti H; Robert M; Lazare D; Kim-Fine S;
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 136(3):471-481. PubMed ID: 32769657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Indications and Complications Associated with the Removal of 506 Pieces of Vaginal Mesh Used in Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.
Miklos JR; Chinthakanan O; Moore RD; Karp DR; Nogueiras GM; Davila GW
Surg Technol Int; 2016 Oct; 29():185-189. PubMed ID: 27780347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain.
Goodall EJ; Cartwright R; Stratta EC; Jackson SR; Price N
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1323-1328. PubMed ID: 30229269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
