BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31599962)

  • 1. Demonstrating sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male genitalia: What is enough?
    Eberhard WG; Lehmann GUC
    Evolution; 2019 Dec; 73(12):2415-2435. PubMed ID: 31599962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental demonstration of possible cryptic female choice on male tsetse fly genitalia.
    Briceño RD; Eberhard WG
    J Insect Physiol; 2009 Nov; 55(11):989-96. PubMed ID: 19607835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Copulation behaviour of Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Muscidae) outside and inside the female, with a discussion of genitalic evolution.
    Briceño RD; Eberhard WG; Robinson AS
    Bull Entomol Res; 2007 Oct; 97(5):471-88. PubMed ID: 17916266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental modifications imply a stimulatory function for male tsetse fly genitalia, supporting cryptic female choice theory.
    Briceño RD; Eberhard WG
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jul; 22(7):1516-25. PubMed ID: 19467130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Copulatory courtship by bushcricket genital titillators revealed by functional morphology, μCT scanning for 3D reconstruction and female sense structures.
    Wulff NC; Lehmann AW; Hipsley CA; Lehmann GU
    Arthropod Struct Dev; 2015 Jul; 44(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 26014975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection on bushcricket genitalia operates in a mosaic pattern.
    Wulff NC; Lehmann GUC
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(5):2320-2338. PubMed ID: 32184984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Female perception of copulatory courtship by male titillators in a bushcricket.
    Wulff NC; Schöneich S; Lehmann GUC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 285(1884):. PubMed ID: 30111598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of cryptic female choice on insemination success: Larger sized and longer copulating male squid ejaculate more, but females influence insemination success by removing spermatangia.
    Sato N; Yoshida MA; Kasugai T
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):111-120. PubMed ID: 27805265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Copulatory courtship by internal genitalia in bushcrickets.
    Wulff NC; van de Kamp T; Dos Santos Rolo T; Baumbach T; Lehmann GU
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42345. PubMed ID: 28169372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia.
    Evans JP; van Lieshout E; Gasparini C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jul; 280(1763):20130749. PubMed ID: 23720546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences.
    Eberhard WG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jun; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10025-32. PubMed ID: 19528642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia.
    Jagadeeshan S; Singh RS
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1058-70. PubMed ID: 16780507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2676-86. PubMed ID: 25403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection and genital evolution: an overview.
    Shamloul R; el-Sakka A; Bella AJ
    J Sex Med; 2010 May; 7(5):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20214717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Origins of female genital diversity: Predation risk and lock-and-key explain rapid divergence during an adaptive radiation.
    Anderson CM; Langerhans RB
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2452-67. PubMed ID: 26259062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    LeVasseur-Viens H; Polak M; Moehring AJ
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1797-807. PubMed ID: 25962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Species-specific genitalic copulatory courtship in sepsid flies (Diptera, Sepsidae, Microsepsis) and theories of genitalic evolution.
    Eberhard WG
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 11263749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of female-biased genital diversity in bedbugs (Cimicidae).
    Roth S; Siva-Jothy MT; Balvín O; Morrow EH; Willassen E; Reinhardt K
    Evolution; 2024 Feb; 78(2):329-341. PubMed ID: 38006287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.
    Gasparini C; Pilastro A; Evans JP
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22329. PubMed ID: 21799825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.