244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31600236)
1. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a compact synchrotron source.
Heck L; Dierolf M; Jud C; Eggl E; Sellerer T; Mechlem K; Günther B; Achterhold K; Gleich B; Metz S; Pfeiffer D; Kröninger K; Herzen J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222816. PubMed ID: 31600236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography using a custom-made quantifier tool (I-STRIP): A proof-of-concept study.
Lobbes MBI; Mulder HKP; Rousch M; Backes WH; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 30150032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria.
Lalji UC; Jeukens CR; Houben I; Nelemans PJ; van Engen RE; van Wylick E; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Paulis LE; Lobbes MB
Eur Radiol; 2015 Oct; 25(10):2813-20. PubMed ID: 25813015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.
Luczyńska E; Heinze S; Adamczyk A; Rys J; Mitus JW; Hendrick E
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4359-66. PubMed ID: 27466557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Degree of Enhancement on Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and Lesion Type on Mammography (MG): Comparison Based on Histological Results.
Łuczyńska E; Niemiec J; Hendrick E; Heinze S; Jaszczyński J; Jakubowicz J; Sas-Korczyńska B; Rys J
Med Sci Monit; 2016 Oct; 22():3886-3893. PubMed ID: 27768681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Iotti V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Coriani C; Caffarri S; Sghedoni R; Nitrosi A; Ragazzi M; Gasparini E; Masini C; Bisagni G; Falco G; Ferrari G; Braglia L; Del Prato A; Malavolti I; Ginocchi V; Pattacini P
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 19(1):106. PubMed ID: 28893303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
Cheung YC; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Huang PC; Chen SC
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.
Perek S; Kiryati N; Zimmerman-Moreno G; Sklair-Levy M; Konen E; Mayer A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 30367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits.
Houben IPL; Van de Voorde P; Jeukens CRLPN; Wildberger JE; Kooreman LF; Smidt ML; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():31-37. PubMed ID: 28941757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
Tsigginou A; Gkali C; Chalazonitis A; Feida E; Vlachos DE; Zagouri F; Rellias I; Dimitrakakis C
Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20160397. PubMed ID: 27452266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.
Xing D; Lv Y; Sun B; Xie H; Dong J; Hao C; Chen Q; Chi X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 30531546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation Between Enhancement Intensity in Contrast Enhancement Spectral Mammography and Types of Kinetic Curves in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Rudnicki W; Heinze S; Piegza T; Pawlak M; Kojs Z; Łuczyńska E
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Mar; 26():e920742. PubMed ID: 32173716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of double layer filter on mean glandular dose (MGD) and image quality in low energy image of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (LE-CESM).
Niroshani HS; Nakamura T; Michiru N; Negishi T
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 34838440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM).
Daniaux M; De Zordo T; Santner W; Amort B; Koppelstätter F; Jaschke W; Dromain C; Oberaigner W; Hubalek M; Marth C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 25814297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
