157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31600815)
1. Is There a Cutoff in Favor of Penetrating Keratoplasty Rather than Endothelial Keratoplasty for Long-Standing Endothelial Decompensation?
Jeng BH
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2021 Aug; 238(8):881-884. PubMed ID: 31600815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.
Heinzelmann S; Böhringer D; Eberwein P; Reinhard T; Maier P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 254(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 26743748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Practical assessment of DSAEK in the management of endothelial decompensation following penetrating keratoplasty].
Neiter E; Goetz C; Tortuyaux F; Ehrhardt A; Houmad N; Perone JM
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):844-852. PubMed ID: 29132691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Center and surgeon effect on outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom.
Greenrod EB; Jones MN; Kaye S; Larkin DF;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 158(5):957-66. PubMed ID: 25089353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of endothelial and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes following failed penetrating keratoplasty: a registry study.
Keane MC; Galettis RA; Mills RA; Coster DJ; Williams KA;
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 100(11):1569-1575. PubMed ID: 26892633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty in patients with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: A registry study.
Roberts PK; Keane M; Yang G; Chan E; Harkin DG; McKirdy N; Daniell M;
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023; 51(7):663-672. PubMed ID: 37608637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Outcomes After Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty Compared With Penetrating Keratoplasty for Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.
Lemaitre D; Tourabaly M; Borderie V; Dechartres A
Cornea; 2023 Jul; 42(7):917-928. PubMed ID: 37185592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective review of graft dislocation rate associated with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after primary failed penetrating keratoplasty.
Clements JL; Bouchard CS; Lee WB; Dunn SP; Mannis MJ; Reidy JJ; John T; Hannush SB; Goins KM; Wagoner MD; Adi MA; Rubenstein JB; Udell IJ; Babiuch AS
Cornea; 2011 Apr; 30(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 21099405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
Woo JH; Ang M; Htoon HM; Tan D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():288-303. PubMed ID: 31228467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of Receiving Keratoplasty for Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy among Medicare Beneficiaries.
Heckenlaible NJ; Dun C; Prescott C; Eghrari AO; Woreta F; Makary MA; Srikumaran D
Ophthalmology; 2023 Jan; 130(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 35932840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty.
Allan BD; Terry MA; Price FW; Price MO; Griffin NB; Claesson M
Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1039-42. PubMed ID: 17893530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paired-eye comparison of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy.
Ashar JN; Ramappa M; Vaddavalli PK
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 97(10):1247-9. PubMed ID: 23613513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Perspectives of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. In search of the perfect lamella].
Heinzelmann S; Maier P; Reinhard T
Ophthalmologe; 2011 Sep; 108(9):825-32. PubMed ID: 21909870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Graft rejection and graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty or posterior lamellar keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
Hjortdal J; Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Ivarsen A
Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):e60-3. PubMed ID: 23086366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Center and Surgeon Effect on Outcomes of Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United Kingdom.
Fajgenbaum MA; Hollick EJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 160(2):392-3. PubMed ID: 26187879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a child after failed penetrating keratoplasty.
Kymionis GD; Kankariya VP; Diakonis VF; Karavitaki AE; Siganos CS; Pallikaris IG
J AAPOS; 2012 Feb; 16(1):95-6. PubMed ID: 22244506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changing Practice Patterns and Long-term Outcomes of Endothelial Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study.
Dickman MM; Peeters JM; van den Biggelaar FJ; Ambergen TA; van Dongen MC; Kruit PJ; Nuijts RM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 170():133-142. PubMed ID: 27497603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a successful alternative to repeat penetrating keratoplasty.
Lee BS; Stark WJ; Jun AS
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 39(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21070545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual Recovery and Endothelial Cell Survival After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty Grafts—A Cohort Study.
Tarantino-Scherrer JN; Kaufmann C; Bochmann F; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Cornea; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1024-9. PubMed ID: 26203743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventive treatment of allograft rejection after endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Magnier F; Dutheil F; Pereira B; Watson SL; Baker JS; Chiambaretta F; Navel V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 100(5):e1061-e1073. PubMed ID: 35411680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
