BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31600967)

  • 21. Changes in hydrogel contact lens power due to flexure.
    Weschsler S; Wilson G
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1978 Feb; 55(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 677250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses and the ocular surface.
    Stapleton F; Stretton S; Papas E; Skotnitsky C; Sweeney DF
    Ocul Surf; 2006 Jan; 4(1):24-43. PubMed ID: 16669523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rate of change and predictive factors for increasing minus contact lens powers in young myopes.
    Kinoshita BT; Chalmers RL; Mitchell GL; Richdale K; Lam DY; Sorbara L; Jansen ME; Wagner H;
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Jul; 98(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 26104592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using optical coherence tomography to assess corneoscleral morphology after soft contact lens wear.
    Alonso-Caneiro D; Shaw AJ; Collins MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1619-26. PubMed ID: 23034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bacterial populations on 30-night extended wear silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Keay L; Willcox MD; Sweeney DF; Morris CA; Harmis N; Corrigan K; Holden BA
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 11215603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of contact lens power profile on peripheral refractive error.
    de la Jara PL; Sankaridurg P; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 91(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 24811847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions*.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Barrado-Navascués E; Rubido-Crespo MJ; Sugimoto K; Sawano T
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 18565093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are Contact Lens Discomfort or Soft Contact Lens Material Properties Associated with Alterations in the Corneal Sub-Basal Nerve Plexus?
    López-De La Rosa A; Arroyo-Del Arroyo C; Cañadas P; López-Miguel A; Calonge M; Enríquez-De-Salamanca A; González-García MJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Apr; 43(4):487-492. PubMed ID: 29286836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Silicone hydrogel mini-scleral contact lenses in early stage after corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: a retrospective case series.
    Severinsky B; Wajnsztajn D; Frucht-Pery J
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Nov; 96(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 23506012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of tear film surface quality measured in vivo on water gradient silicone hydrogel and hydrogel contact lenses.
    Szczesna-Iskander DH
    Eye Contact Lens; 2014 Jan; 40(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 24335451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy.
    Alonso-Caneiro D; Iskander DR; Collins MJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 19657279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Chan B; Choy C; Ng V
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses.
    Pearson RM; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 22958210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Which soft lens power is better for piggyback in keratoconus? Part II.
    Romero-Jiménez M; Santodomingo-Rubido J; González-Meijóme JM; Flores-Rodriguez P; Villa-Collar C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25458076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical benefits of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution in silicone hydrogel and soft contact lens users.
    Campbell R; Kame G; Leach N; Paul M; White E; Zigler L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Mar; 38(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 22297841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sagittal height differences of frequent replacement silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    van der Worp E; Mertz C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Jun; 38(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25704462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mechanical properties of contact lenses: The contribution of measurement techniques and clinical feedback to 50 years of materials development.
    Bhamra TS; Tighe BJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):70-81. PubMed ID: 27884616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How rigid gas-permeable lenses supply more oxygen to the cornea than silicone hydrogels: a new model.
    Ichijima H; Cavanagh HD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Sep; 33(5):216-23. PubMed ID: 17873624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
    Romero-Jiménez M; Santodomingo-Rubido J; Flores-Rodríguez P; González-Méijome JM
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Feb; 36(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 23108009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bacterial populations on silicone hydrogel and hydrogel contact lenses after swimming in a chlorinated pool.
    Choo J; Vuu K; Bergenske P; Burnham K; Smythe J; Caroline P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 15711460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.