These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31601231)

  • 1. Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.
    Afzal I; Radha S; Smoljanović T; Stafford GH; Twyman R; Field RE
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 14(1):318. PubMed ID: 31601231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of primary metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland using data from the London Implant Retrieval Centre: a study using the NJR dataset.
    Sabah SA; Henckel J; Cook E; Whittaker R; Hothi H; Pappas Y; Blunn G; Skinner JA; Hart AJ
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Jan; 97-B(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 25568407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does laminar airflow make a difference to the infection rates for lower limb arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry and local surgical site infection data for two hospitals with and without laminar airflow.
    Singh S; Reddy S; Shrivastava R
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 27687918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint replacement registries.
    McGrory BJ; Etkin CD; Lewallen DG
    Arthroplast Today; 2016 Jun; 2(2):83-86. PubMed ID: 28326404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is American Joint Replacement Registry Data Consistent With International Survivorship in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Analysis.
    Springer BD; Mullen KP; Donnelly PC; Tucker K; Caton E; Huddleston JI
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S46-S50. PubMed ID: 38417557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of the Surgical Practice of Potential Revision Outlier Joint Replacement Surgeons With Non-outliers: A Case Control Study From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Penfold CM; Whitehouse MR; Sayers A; Wilkinson JM; Hunt L; Ben-Shlomo Y; Judge A; Blom AW
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Apr; 36(4):1239-1245.e6. PubMed ID: 33160808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term survivorship and results in lower limb arthroplasty: a registry-based comparison study.
    Ho KK; Chau WW; Lau LC; Ng JP; Chiu KH; Ong MT
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):307. PubMed ID: 37076860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Schrama JC; Espehaug B; Hallan G; Engesaeter LB; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Fevang BT
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2010 Apr; 62(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20391501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision total knee replacement: A two-year review of complexity data and regional workload in South West England.
    Reynolds PM; Phillips JRA; Evans JT; Searle D; Sword ; Toms AD
    Knee; 2021 Aug; 31():22-27. PubMed ID: 34111798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What are the inpatient and day case costs following primary total hip replacement of patients treated for prosthetic joint infection: a matched cohort study using linked data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.
    Garfield K; Noble S; Lenguerrand E; Whitehouse MR; Sayers A; Reed MR; Blom AW
    BMC Med; 2020 Nov; 18(1):335. PubMed ID: 33203455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with implant survival following total hip replacement surgery: A registry study of data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Evans JT; Blom AW; Timperley AJ; Dieppe P; Wilson MJ; Sayers A; Whitehouse MR
    PLoS Med; 2020 Aug; 17(8):e1003291. PubMed ID: 32866147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First outcome results after total knee and hip replacement from the Lithuanian arthroplasty register.
    Tarasevičius S; Cebatorius A; Valavičienė R; Stučinskas J; Leonas L; Robertsson O
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2014; 50(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 25172602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of Introducing New Technology: Comparative Survivorship Modeling of Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements and Contemporary Alternatives in the National Joint Registry.
    Hunt LP; Whitehouse MR; Beswick A; Porter ML; Howard P; Blom AW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Feb; 100(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 29406339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are all metal-on-metal hip revision operations contributing to the National Joint Registry implant survival curves? : a study comparing the London Implant Retrieval Centre and National Joint Registry datasets.
    Sabah SA; Henckel J; Koutsouris S; Rajani R; Hothi H; Skinner JA; Hart AJ
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Jan; 98-B(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26733513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consent process for elective total hip and knee arthroplasty.
    Beresford-Cleary NJ; Halliday J; Breusch SJ; Biant LC
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2011 Dec; 19(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 22184153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographical Variation in Outcomes of Primary Hip and Knee Replacement.
    Garriga C; Leal J; Sánchez-Santos MT; Arden N; Price A; Prieto-Alhambra D; Carr A; Rangan A; Cooper C; Peat G; Fitzpatrick R; Barker K; Judge A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Oct; 2(10):e1914325. PubMed ID: 31664449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between surgeon and hospital volume and outcome of first-time revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening.
    Holleyman RJ; Jameson SS; Meek RMD; Khanduja V; Reed MR; Judge A; Board TN
    Bone Joint J; 2024 Oct; 106-B(10):1050-1058. PubMed ID: 39348904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demographic and geographical variability in physiotherapy provision following hip and knee replacement. An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Smith TO; Dainty JR; Clark EM; Whitehouse MR; Price AJ; MacGregor AJ
    Physiotherapy; 2020 Mar; 106():1-11. PubMed ID: 32026841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study.
    Smith LK; Garriga C; Kingsbury SR; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Delmestri A; Arden NK; Stone M; Conaghan PG; Judge A
    BMJ Open; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e050877. PubMed ID: 35264338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.