175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31601589)
1. Validity of sample sizes in publications of randomised controlled trials on the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: cross-sectional evaluation.
Tulka S; Geis B; Baulig C; Knippschild S; Krummenauer F
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e030312. PubMed ID: 31601589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting of statistical sample size calculations in publications of trials on age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and cataract.
Tulka S; Knippschild S; Funck S; Goetjes I; Uluk Y; Baulig C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252640. PubMed ID: 34086796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Influence of impact factor on reporting sample size calculations in publications on studies exemplified by AMD treatment : Cross-sectional investigation on the presence of sample size calculations in publications of RCTs on AMD treatment in journals with low and high impact factors].
Tulka S; Geis B; Knippschild S; Baulig C; Krummenauer F
Ophthalmologe; 2020 Feb; 117(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 31201561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations.
Baulig C; Krummenauer F; Geis B; Tulka S; Knippschild S
BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e021912. PubMed ID: 29789352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Power and Sample Size Calculation in Rehabilitation Trial Reports: A Methodological Assessment.
Castellini G; Gianola S; Bonovas S; Moja L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1195-201. PubMed ID: 26971671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting of sample size calculations in analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review.
McKeown A; Gewandter JS; McDermott MP; Pawlowski JR; Poli JJ; Rothstein D; Farrar JT; Gilron I; Katz NP; Lin AH; Rappaport BA; Rowbotham MC; Turk DC; Dworkin RH; Smith SM
J Pain; 2015 Mar; 16(3):199-206.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25481494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study.
Tam W; Lo K; Woo B
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Feb; 102():103450. PubMed ID: 31731176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review.
Copsey B; Dutton S; Fitzpatrick R; Lamb SE; Cook JA
Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):466. PubMed ID: 29017518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting and methodological quality of sample size calculations in cluster randomized trials could be improved: a review.
Rutterford C; Taljaard M; Dixon S; Copas A; Eldridge S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 25523375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size calculations for randomized clinical trials published in anesthesiology journals: a comparison of 2010 versus 2016.
Chow JTY; Turkstra TP; Yim E; Jones PM
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 65(6):611-618. PubMed ID: 29569142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design characteristic of randomised controlled trials for geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: selection of outcomes and sample size calculation.
Krezel AK; Hogg RE; Krezel S; Fallis R; Azuara-Blanco A
Eye (Lond); 2015 Nov; 29(11):1458-63. PubMed ID: 26206532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of the reported sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed.
Lee PH; Tse ACY
Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():16-21. PubMed ID: 27769569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review.
Charles P; Giraudeau B; Dechartres A; Baron G; Ravaud P
BMJ; 2009 May; 338():b1732. PubMed ID: 19435763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials with repeatedly measured continuous variables as primary outcomes need improvements: a cross-sectional study.
Ren Y; Jia Y; Yang M; Yao M; Wang Y; Mei F; Li Q; Li L; Li G; Huang Y; Zhang Y; Xu J; Zou K; Tan J; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111235. PubMed ID: 38072178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies.
Fung AE; Palanki R; Bakri SJ; Depperschmidt E; Gibson A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 19091408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size and number of outcome measures of veterinary randomised controlled trials of pharmaceutical interventions funded by different sources, a cross-sectional study.
Wareham KJ; Hyde RM; Grindlay D; Brennan ML; Dean RS
BMC Vet Res; 2017 Oct; 13(1):295. PubMed ID: 28978314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Premature trial discontinuation often not accurately reflected in registries: comparison of registry records with publications.
Alturki R; Schandelmaier S; Olu KK; von Niederhäusern B; Agarwal A; Frei R; Bhatnagar N; Hooft L; von Elm E; Briel M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():56-63. PubMed ID: 27614277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of target effect sizes in randomised controlled trials published in the Health Technology Assessment journal.
Rothwell JC; Julious SA; Cooper CL
Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):544. PubMed ID: 30305146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review.
Abdulatif M; Mukhtar A; Obayah G
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 115(5):699-707. PubMed ID: 26041717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
BMJ; 2008 Dec; 337():a2299. PubMed ID: 19056791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
