These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31603045)

  • 41. What is the mechanism for fluency in successive recognition?
    Poldrack RA; Logan GD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1998 Apr; 98(2-3):167-81. PubMed ID: 9621829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The temporal dynamics of perceptual and conceptual fluency on recognition memory.
    Wang W; Li B; Gao C; Guo C
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():1-12. PubMed ID: 30176534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of the familiarity difference cue in inferential judgments.
    Xu P; González-Vallejo C; Weinhardt J; Chimeli J; Karadogan F
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):298-314. PubMed ID: 29067637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fluency effects in recognition memory: are perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency interchangeable?
    Lanska M; Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24001021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The secret life of fluency.
    Oppenheimer DM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Jun; 12(6):237-41. PubMed ID: 18468944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief.
    Blake AB; Castel AD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is that a human? Categorization (dis)fluency drives evaluations of agents ambiguous on human-likeness.
    Carr EW; Hofree G; Sheldon K; Saygin AP; Winkielman P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):651-666. PubMed ID: 28125254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. If it's hard to read, it changes how long you do it: reading time as an explanation for perceptual fluency effects on judgment.
    Sanchez CA; Jaeger AJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):206-11. PubMed ID: 24825308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Paranoia is associated with impaired novelty detection and overconfidence in recognition memory judgments.
    Koller WN; Cannon TD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2021 Apr; 130(3):273-285. PubMed ID: 33492156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Expectations alter recognition and event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Andrew Leynes P; Batterman A; Abrimian A
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103573. PubMed ID: 31195236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fluency heuristic: a model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval.
    Hertwig R; Herzog SM; Schooler LJ; Reimer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1191-206. PubMed ID: 18763900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency.
    Unkelbach C
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Apr; 17(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 16623692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition.
    Westerman DL; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jun; 31(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 12872877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Behaviors speak louder than explicit reports: Implicit metacognition in 2.5-year-old children.
    Geurten M; Bastin C
    Dev Sci; 2019 Mar; 22(2):e12742. PubMed ID: 30159971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intuitive (in)coherence judgments are guided by processing fluency, mood and affect.
    Sweklej J; Balas R; Pochwatko G; Godlewska M
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jan; 78(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 23412706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Self-generated cognitive fluency: consequences on evaluative judgments.
    von Hecker U; Hanel PHP; Jin Z; Winkielman P
    Cogn Emot; 2023 Mar; 37(2):254-270. PubMed ID: 36706229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.
    Boldt A; de Gardelle V; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 28383959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Listeners remember music they like.
    Stalinski SM; Schellenberg EG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):700-16. PubMed ID: 22905936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of processing fluency on comparative performance judgments.
    Reber R; Meier B; Ruch-Monachon MA; Tiberini M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 16554016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of calibration for reconstructed eye-witness memories.
    Bonham AJ; González-Vallejo C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 19362279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.