135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31603246)
1. Brazilian and French sensory perception of complex cosmetic formulations: a cross-cultural study.
Calixto LS; Maia Campos PMBG; Picard C; Savary G
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2020 Feb; 42(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31603246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between sensory and instrumental characterization of developed sunscreens containing grape seed extract and a commercial product.
Yarovaya L; Waranuch N; Wisuitiprot W; Khunkitti W
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2022 Oct; 44(5):569-587. PubMed ID: 35975647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements meet perceptions: rheology-texture-sensory relations when using green, bio-derived emollients in cosmetic emulsions.
Huynh A; Garcia AG; Young LK; Szoboszlai M; Liberatore MW; Baki G
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2021 Feb; 43(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 32886359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo photoprotective effects of cosmetic formulations containing UV filters, vitamins, Ginkgo biloba and red algae extracts.
Mercurio DG; Wagemaker TA; Alves VM; Benevenuto CG; Gaspar LR; Maia Campos PM
J Photochem Photobiol B; 2015 Dec; 153():121-6. PubMed ID: 26402714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical-Mechanical characterization of cosmetic formulations and correlation between instrumental measurements and sensorial properties.
Calixto LS; Maia Campos PMBG
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2017 Oct; 39(5):527-534. PubMed ID: 28555924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of nanoencapsulation on the sensory properties of cosmetic formulations containing lipoic acid.
Külkamp-Guerreiro IC; Berlitz SJ; Contri RV; Alves LR; Henrique EG; Barreiros VR; Guterres SS
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2013 Feb; 35(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 23075068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The multifunctional value of sunscreen-containing cosmetics.
Draelos ZD
Skin Therapy Lett; 2011; 16(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 21833463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Nano is big! : Facts and myths about nanoparticulate UV filters].
Surber C; Plautz J; Osterwalder U
Hautarzt; 2022 Apr; 73(4):266-274. PubMed ID: 35190848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensory and instrumental characterization of fast inverting oil-in-water emulsions for cosmetic application.
Korać R; Krajišnik D; Milić J
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Jun; 38(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 26444550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Evaluation of Photoprotective O/W Emulsions Containing Hydroalcoholic Extract of
de Oliveira-Júnior RG; Souza GR; Ferraz CAA; de Oliveira AP; Araújo CS; de Lima-Saraiva SRG; Reis SAGB; Gonçalves TM; Rolim LA; Rolim-Neto PJ; César FCS; Almeida JRGDS
ScientificWorldJournal; 2017; 2017():5019458. PubMed ID: 28680948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for screening sunscreen cream formulations by determination of in vitro SPF and PA values using UV transmission spectroscopy and texture profile analysis.
Khunkitti W; Satthanakul P; Waranuch N; Pitaksuteepong T; Kitikhun P
J Cosmet Sci; 2014; 65(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 25043486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative behavior between sunscreens based on free or encapsulated UV filters in term of skin penetration, retention and photo-stability.
Cozzi AC; Perugini P; Gourion-Arsiquaud S
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2018 Aug; 121():309-318. PubMed ID: 29874551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between sensory and instrumental characterization of topical formulations: impact of thickening agents.
Estanqueiro M; Amaral MH; Sousa Lobo JM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Aug; 38(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 26700373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Sun Protection Factor of Cosmetic Formulations Containing Afzelin.
Kim M; Shin S; Ryu D; Cho E; Yoo J; Park D; Jung E
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2021 Nov; 69(11):1039-1044. PubMed ID: 34456215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensory analysis of cosmetic powders: personal care ingredients and emulsions.
Moussour M; Lavarde M; Pensé-Lhéritier AM; Bouton F
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2017 Feb; 39(1):83-89. PubMed ID: 27383046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of UV filters on the texture profile and efficacy of a cosmetic formulation.
Fossa Shirata MM; Campos PMBGM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2017 Dec; 39(6):622-628. PubMed ID: 28865102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards satisfying performance of an O/W cosmetic emulsion: screening of reformulation factors on textural and rheological properties using general experimental design.
Filipovic M; Lukic M; Djordjevic S; Krstonosic V; Pantelic I; Vuleta G; Savic S
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2017 Oct; 39(5):486-499. PubMed ID: 28403533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interactions between UV filters and active substances in emulsion: Effect on microstructure, physicochemical and in-vivo properties.
Calixto LS; Maia Campos PMBG; Savary G; Picard C
Int J Pharm; 2018 Dec; 553(1-2):220-228. PubMed ID: 30316792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative sensory and instrumental analyses and principal components of commercial sunscreens.
Vergilio MM; de Freitas ACP; da Rocha-Filho PA
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Feb; 21(2):729-739. PubMed ID: 33786956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Main features and applications of organogels in cosmetics.
Martinez RM; Rosado C; Velasco MVR; Lannes SCS; Baby AR
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2019 Apr; 41(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 30994939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
