These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31604091)

  • 1. The Use and Misuse of Indirectly Standardized, Risk-Adjusted Outcomes and Star Ratings.
    Shahian DM; Kozower BD; Fernandez FG; Badhwar V; O'Brien SM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 May; 109(5):1319-1322. PubMed ID: 31604091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Risk adjustment in quality comparison - why hierarchical models?].
    Richter D
    Pflege; 2014 Apr; 27(2):129. PubMed ID: 24670545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk-adjusted indices for measuring the quality of inpatient care.
    Forthman MT; Gold RS; Dove HG; Henderson RD
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 20588144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research evidence on the validity of risk-adjusted mortality rate as a measure of hospital quality of care.
    Thomas JW; Hofer TP
    Med Care Res Rev; 1998 Dec; 55(4):371-404. PubMed ID: 9844348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Risk-adjusted assessment of neonatology wards by the new quality indicator "transfer rate of mature newborns"].
    Gmyrek D; Koch R; Vogtmann C; Kaiser A; Friedrich A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 21496782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent applications of risk adjustment for performance measures used by state inpatient psychiatric facilities.
    Schacht LM; Hines H
    Harv Rev Psychiatry; 2003; 11(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 12944130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reach for the Stars.
    Panozzo G
    Home Healthc Now; 2018; 36(3):185-188. PubMed ID: 29722709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a consumer-oriented internet health care report card: the risk of quality ratings based on mortality data.
    Krumholz HM; Rathore SS; Chen J; Wang Y; Radford MJ
    JAMA; 2002 Mar; 287(10):1277-87. PubMed ID: 11886319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transparency: a mandatory requirement for risk models.
    Shahian DM; Hutter MM; Torchiana DF; Iezzoni LI
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jun; 206(6):1240-2; author reply 1242-5. PubMed ID: 18501829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-adjusted clinical quality indicators: indices for measuring and monitoring rates of mortality, complications, and readmissions.
    DesHarnais SI; Forthman MT; Homa-Lowry JM; Wooster LD
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2000; 9(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 11185878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships between Medicare Advantage contract characteristics and quality-of-care ratings: an observational analysis of Medicare Advantage star ratings.
    Xu P; Burgess JF; Cabral H; Soria-Saucedo R; Kazis LE
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Mar; 162(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 25732277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings for cancer surgery.
    Osborne NH; Ghaferi AA; Nicholas LH; Dimick JB; Mph M
    Arch Surg; 2011 May; 146(5):600-4. PubMed ID: 21576612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in Colonoscopy Quality Among Facilities: Development of a Post-Colonoscopy Risk-Standardized Rate of Unplanned Hospital Visits.
    Ranasinghe I; Parzynski CS; Searfoss R; Montague J; Lin Z; Allen J; Vender R; Bhat K; Ross JS; Bernheim S; Krumholz HM; Drye EE
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Jan; 150(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 26404952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in Accessing Nursing Homes With High Star Ratings.
    Yuan Y; Louis C; Cabral H; Schneider JC; Ryan CM; Kazis LE
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2018 Oct; 19(10):852-859.e2. PubMed ID: 29983361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing "The best".
    Linehan DC; Jaques D
    Arch Surg; 2011 May; 146(5):604-5. PubMed ID: 21739657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing Public Quality Ratings for Accredited and Nonaccredited Nursing Homes.
    Williams SC; Morton DJ; Braun BI; Longo BA; Baker DW
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2017 Jan; 18(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 27600192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National hospital ratings systems share few common scores and may generate confusion instead of clarity.
    Austin JM; Jha AK; Romano PS; Singer SJ; Vogus TJ; Wachter RM; Pronovost PJ
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2015 Mar; 34(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 25732492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk-adjusted outcomes and perioperative care.
    Napolitano LM; Bass BL
    Surg Clin North Am; 2005 Dec; 85(6):1341-6, xiv. PubMed ID: 16326214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of extreme-risk cases on hospitals' risk-adjusted percutaneous coronary intervention mortality ratings.
    Sherwood MW; Brennan JM; Ho KK; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Weaver WD; Dai D; Peterson ED
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):10-6. PubMed ID: 25499301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconsidering Hospital Readmission Measures.
    Pronovost PJ; Brotman DJ; Hoyer EH; Deutschendorf A
    J Hosp Med; 2017 Dec; 12(12):1009-1011. PubMed ID: 29236100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.