112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31604892)
1. Optimization of
Christian PE; Williams SP; Burrell L; Castaneda P; Albiani J; Sandella N; Iagaru A; Hoffman JM; de Crespigny A; Bohorquez SS
J Nucl Med Technol; 2020 Mar; 48(1):54-57. PubMed ID: 31604892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance.
Makris NE; Boellaard R; Visser EP; de Jong JR; Vanderlinden B; Wierts R; van der Veen BJ; Greuter HJ; Vugts DJ; van Dongen GA; Lammertsma AA; Huisman MC
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):264-7. PubMed ID: 24357686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond 18F-FDG: Characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR Scanners for a Comprehensive Set of Positron Emitters of Growing Application--18F, 11C, 89Zr, 124I, 68Ga, and 90Y.
Soderlund AT; Chaal J; Tjio G; Totman JJ; Conti M; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 26135111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.
Lorsakul A; Li Q; Trott CM; Hoog C; Petibon Y; Ouyang J; Laine AF; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102504. PubMed ID: 25281979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality of Zr-89 PET imaging in the Siemens microPET Focus 220 preclinical scanner.
Bradshaw TJ; Voorbach MJ; Reuter DR; Giamis AM; Mudd SR; Beaver JD
Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Jun; 18(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 26493052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved PET quantification and harmonization by adaptive denoising.
Namías M; Jeraj R
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015023. PubMed ID: 33438611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides.
Carter LM; Kesner AL; Pratt EC; Sanders VA; Massicano AVF; Cutler CS; Lapi SE; Lewis JS
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 31001765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel approach for quantitative harmonization in PET.
Namías M; Bradshaw T; Menezes VO; Machado MAD; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095019. PubMed ID: 29726406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.
Chang T; Chang G; Clark JW; Diab RH; Rohren E; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5891-900. PubMed ID: 23039628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantom and methodology for comparison of small lesion detectability in PET.
Wollenweber SD; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 36576853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
