209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31605622)
1. Correlative climatic niche models predict real and virtual species distributions equally well.
Journé V; Barnagaud JY; Bernard C; Crochet PA; Morin X
Ecology; 2020 Jan; 101(1):e02912. PubMed ID: 31605622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into species distribution models alters forecasts of climate-mediated range shifts.
Crase B; Liedloff A; Vesk PA; Fukuda Y; Wintle BA
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Aug; 20(8):2566-79. PubMed ID: 24845950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Climatic associations of British species distributions show good transferability in time but low predictive accuracy for range change.
Rapacciuolo G; Roy DB; Gillings S; Fox R; Walker K; Purvis A
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40212. PubMed ID: 22792243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating eco-evolutionary information into species distribution models provides comprehensive predictions of species range shifts under climate change.
Lu WX; Wang ZZ; Hu XY; Rao GY
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():169501. PubMed ID: 38145682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Climate change and freshwater biodiversity: detected patterns, future trends and adaptations in northern regions.
Heino J; Virkkala R; Toivonen H
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Feb; 84(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 19032595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial Autocorrelation Can Generate Stronger Correlations between Range Size and Climatic Niches Than the Biological Signal - A Demonstration Using Bird and Mammal Range Maps.
Boucher-Lalonde V; Currie DJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166243. PubMed ID: 27855201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cetacean range and climate in the eastern North Atlantic: future predictions and implications for conservation.
Lambert E; Pierce GJ; Hall K; Brereton T; Dunn TE; Wall D; Jepson PD; Deaville R; MacLeod CD
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1782-93. PubMed ID: 24677422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating abundance information and guiding variable selection for climate-based ensemble forecasting of species' distributional shifts.
Tanner EP; Papeş M; Elmore RD; Fuhlendorf SD; Davis CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184316. PubMed ID: 28886075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrating mechanistic and empirical model projections to assess climate impacts on tree species distributions in northwestern North America.
Case MJ; Lawler JJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 May; 23(5):2005-2015. PubMed ID: 27859937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Illuminating geographical patterns in species' range shifts.
Grenouillet G; Comte L
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Oct; 20(10):3080-91. PubMed ID: 24616088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetically informed ecological niche models improve climate change predictions.
Ikeda DH; Max TL; Allan GJ; Lau MK; Shuster SM; Whitham TG
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jan; 23(1):164-176. PubMed ID: 27543682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dispersal and extrapolation on the accuracy of temporal predictions from distribution models for the Darwin's frog.
Uribe-Rivera DE; Soto-Azat C; Valenzuela-Sánchez A; Bizama G; Simonetti JA; Pliscoff P
Ecol Appl; 2017 Jul; 27(5):1633-1645. PubMed ID: 28397328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Range edges in heterogeneous landscapes: Integrating geographic scale and climate complexity into range dynamics.
Oldfather MF; Kling MM; Sheth SN; Emery NC; Ackerly DD
Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Mar; 26(3):1055-1067. PubMed ID: 31674701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrating mechanistic and correlative niche models to unravel range-limiting processes in a temperate amphibian.
Enriquez-Urzelai U; Kearney MR; Nicieza AG; Tingley R
Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Aug; 25(8):2633-2647. PubMed ID: 31050846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Community science validates climate suitability projections from ecological niche modeling.
Saunders SP; Michel NL; Bateman BL; Wilsey CB; Dale K; LeBaron GS; Langham GM
Ecol Appl; 2020 Sep; 30(6):e02128. PubMed ID: 32223029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond the model: expert knowledge improves predictions of species' fates under climate change.
Reside AE; Critchell K; Crayn DM; Goosem M; Goosem S; Hoskin CJ; Sydes T; Vanderduys EP; Pressey RL
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jan; 29(1):e01824. PubMed ID: 30390399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The pace of past climate change vs. potential bird distributions and land use in the United States.
Bateman BL; Pidgeon AM; Radeloff VC; VanDerWal J; Thogmartin WE; Vavrus SJ; Heglund PJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Mar; 22(3):1130-44. PubMed ID: 26691721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional traits help to explain half-century long shifts in pollinator distributions.
Aguirre-Gutiérrez J; Kissling WD; Carvalheiro LG; WallisDeVries MF; Franzén M; Biesmeijer JC
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24451. PubMed ID: 27079784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data.
Malchow AK; Fandos G; Kormann UG; Grüebler MU; Kéry M; Hartig F; Zurell D
Ecol Appl; 2024 Jun; 34(4):e2966. PubMed ID: 38629509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling plant species distributions under future climates: how fine scale do climate projections need to be?
Franklin J; Davis FW; Ikegami M; Syphard AD; Flint LE; Flint AL; Hannah L
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Feb; 19(2):473-83. PubMed ID: 23504785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
