These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31606049)

  • 1. Assessment of spinal cord motion as a new diagnostic MRI-parameter in cervical spinal canal stenosis: study protocol on a prospective longitudinal trial.
    Wolf K; Krafft AJ; Egger K; Klingler JH; Hubbe U; Reisert M; Hohenhaus M
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 14(1):321. PubMed ID: 31606049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is microdiffusion imaging able to improve the detection of cervical myelopathy? Study protocol of a prospective observational trial (MIDICAM-Trial).
    Hohenhaus M; Egger K; Klingler JH; Hubbe U; Reisert M; Wolf K
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e029153. PubMed ID: 31481554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency, timing, and predictors of neurological dysfunction in the nonmyelopathic patient with cervical spinal cord compression, canal stenosis, and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Wilson JR; Barry S; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC; Arnold PM; Riew KD; Shaffrey CI; Traynelis VC; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S37-54. PubMed ID: 23963005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Focal cervical spinal stenosis causes mechanical strain on the entire cervical spinal cord tissue - A prospective controlled, matched-pair analysis based on phase-contrast MRI.
    Wolf K; Reisert M; Beltrán SF; Klingler JH; Hubbe U; Krafft AJ; Egger K; Hohenhaus M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2021; 30():102580. PubMed ID: 33578322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods in the assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy.
    Karpova A; Arun R; Davis AM; Kulkarni AV; Mikulis DJ; Sooyong C; Rabin D; Craciunas S; Smith SR; Hansen MA; George J; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 22772577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in degenerative cervical myelopathy.
    Pfender N; Rosner J; Zipser CM; Friedl S; Vallotton K; Sutter R; Klarhoefer M; Schubert M; Betz M; Spirig JM; Seif M; Hubli M; Freund P; Farshad M; Curt A; Hupp M
    J Neuroimaging; 2022 Nov; 32(6):1121-1133. PubMed ID: 35962464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of spinal cord compression using T1 mapping in patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis - Preliminary experience.
    Maier IL; Hofer S; Joseph AA; Merboldt KD; Eggert E; Behme D; Schregel K; von der Brelie C; Rohde V; Koch J; Psychogios MN; Frahm J; Liman J; Bähr M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2019; 21():101639. PubMed ID: 30553763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Congenital Cervical Spine Stenosis in a Multicenter Global Cohort of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Ambispective Report Based on a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic Criterion.
    Nouri A; Tetreault L; Nori S; Martin AR; Nater A; Fehlings MG
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Sep; 83(3):521-528. PubMed ID: 29462433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of cervical spinal stenosis by automated 3D MRI segmentation of spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid space.
    Hohenhaus M; Klingler JH; Scholz C; Watzlawick R; Hubbe U; Beck J; Reisert M; Würtemberger U; Kremers N; Wolf K
    Spinal Cord; 2024 Jul; 62(7):371-377. PubMed ID: 38627568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased spinal cord movements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Vavasour IM; Meyers SM; MacMillan EL; Mädler B; Li DK; Rauscher A; Vertinsky T; Venu V; MacKay AL; Curt A
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2344-54. PubMed ID: 24462810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential thresholds of critically increased cardiac-related spinal cord motion in degenerative cervical myelopathy.
    Pfender N; Jutzeler CR; Hubli M; Scheuren PS; Pfyffer D; Zipser CM; Rosner J; Friedl S; Sutter R; Spirig JM; Betz M; Schubert M; Seif M; Freund P; Farshad M; Curt A; Hupp M
    Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1411182. PubMed ID: 38978814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study the degree of cervical spinal canal stenosis by MRI in flexion and extension of the cervical vertebrae].
    Zhong YM; Shi M; Li ZF; Xu JW; Zha JL; Yang G; Wei JD
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Feb; 22(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 19281025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In cervical spondylotic myelopathy spinal cord motion is focally increased at the level of stenosis: a controlled cross-sectional study.
    Wolf K; Hupp M; Friedl S; Sutter R; Klarhöfer M; Grabher P; Freund P; Curt A
    Spinal Cord; 2018 Aug; 56(8):769-776. PubMed ID: 29497178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with standing cervical radiographs for evaluation of vertebral canal stenosis in equine cervical stenotic myelopathy.
    Janes JG; Garrett KS; McQuerry KJ; Pease AP; Williams NM; Reed SM; MacLeod JN
    Equine Vet J; 2014 Nov; 46(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 24329734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility, temporal stability, and functional correlation of diffusion MR measurements within the spinal cord in patients with asymptomatic cervical stenosis or cervical myelopathy.
    Ellingson BM; Salamon N; Woodworth DC; Yokota H; Holly LT
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):472-480. PubMed ID: 29424671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis.
    Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Aebli N; Wisianowsky C; Krebs J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. T1 mapping in patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis with and without decompressive surgery: A longitudinal study.
    Stefanie M; Antonia G; Leah Shyela V; Sabine H; Peter D; Jens F; Daniel B; Christian B; Veit R; Mathias B; Jan L; Ilko L M
    J Neuroimaging; 2024; 34(3):329-338. PubMed ID: 38403747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influence of Cervical Spondylotic Spinal Cord Compression on Cerebral Cortical Adaptation. Radiological Study].
    Hrabálek L; Hluštík P; Hok P; Čecháková E; Wanek T; Otruba P; Vaverka M; Kaňovský P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(6):404-11. PubMed ID: 26787180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of cervical canal stenosis in farmers: Epidemiological study based on radiographic parameter of spinal cord injury patients.
    Wada K; Kumagai G; Kudo H; Asari T; Ota S; Kamei K; Koyama K; Nakaji S; Ishibashi Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Mar; 25(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 31000376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CSF Flow and Spinal Cord Motion in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Phase Contrast MRI Study.
    Wolf K; Luetzen N; Mast H; Kremers N; Reisert M; Beltrán S; Fung C; Beck J; Urbach H
    Neurology; 2023 Feb; 100(7):e651-e660. PubMed ID: 36357188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.