These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3160626)
1. Influence of abrasive particle size and contact stress on the wear rate of dental restorative materials. Harrison A; Moores GE Dent Mater; 1985 Feb; 1(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3160626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins: two-year results. Stangel I; Barolet RY J Oral Rehabil; 1990 May; 17(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 2189972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Filler particle size and composite resin classification systems. Lang BR; Jaarda M; Wang RF J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Nov; 19(6):569-84. PubMed ID: 1469493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel. Ratledge DK; Smith BG; Wilson RF J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 7932268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins. Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E Dent Mater; 1992 May; 8(3):146-8. PubMed ID: 1387854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resin. Mitchem JC; Gronas DG J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Mar; 104(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 6949979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The abrasion of dental composite by cobalt-chromium clasps. Hamirudin MM; Barsby MJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17378453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wear of composite resin in vitro: a testing machine with rubber plate. Preliminary results. Hengchang X; Vingerling PA; Wenyi L; Gang Z; Tong W J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jan; 17(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 2137165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-dependent deformation of composite restorative materials in compression. Cock DJ; Watts DC J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 64(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 3156163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The continued in vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resins. Mitchem JC; Gronas DG J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Dec; 111(6):961-4. PubMed ID: 2933440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Marginal leakage test on "Silux" composite resin]. Kwon HC Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1988 Apr; 26(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 2978623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Resistance to fracture in posterior composites. Measurement of their fracture toughness and a comparison with other restorative materials. Lloyd CH Br Dent J; 1983 Dec; 155(12):411-4. PubMed ID: 6230090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of a hydraulic jet prophylaxis system on composites. Reel DC; Abrams H; Gardner SL; Mitchell RJ J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 2542536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]