220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31606332)
1. Predicting Prostate Cancer Death with Different Pretreatment Risk Stratification Tools: A Head-to-head Comparison in a Nationwide Cohort Study.
Zelic R; Garmo H; Zugna D; Stattin P; Richiardi L; Akre O; Pettersson A
Eur Urol; 2020 Feb; 77(2):180-188. PubMed ID: 31606332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of a novel machine learning framework for predicting non-metastatic prostate cancer-specific mortality in men using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Lee C; Light A; Alaa A; Thurtle D; van der Schaar M; Gnanapragasam VJ
Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Mar; 3(3):e158-e165. PubMed ID: 33549512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models.
Boehm K; Larcher A; Beyer B; Tian Z; Tilki D; Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Budäus L
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 26272236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study.
Gnanapragasam VJ; Lophatananon A; Wright KA; Muir KR; Gavin A; Greenberg DC
PLoS Med; 2016 Aug; 13(8):e1002063. PubMed ID: 27483464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Cambridge Prognostic Groups for improved prediction of disease mortality at diagnosis in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer: a validation study.
Gnanapragasam VJ; Bratt O; Muir K; Lee LS; Huang HH; Stattin P; Lophatananon A
BMC Med; 2018 Feb; 16(1):31. PubMed ID: 29490658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of a Clinical Prognostic Stage Group System for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Using Disease-Specific Mortality Results From the International Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate.
Dess RT; Suresh K; Zelefsky MJ; Freedland SJ; Mahal BA; Cooperberg MR; Davis BJ; Horwitz EM; Terris MK; Amling CL; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Jackson WC; Hearn JWD; Deville C; DeWeese TL; Greco S; McNutt TR; Song DY; Sun Y; Mehra R; Kaffenberger SD; Morgan TM; Nguyen PL; Feng FY; Sharma V; Tran PT; Stish BJ; Pisansky TM; Zaorsky NG; Moraes FY; Berlin A; Finelli A; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Briganti A; Carroll PR; Karnes RJ; Kattan MW; Schipper MJ; Spratt DE
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Dec; 6(12):1912-1920. PubMed ID: 33090219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Dell'Oglio P; Tian Z; Schiffmann J; Shariat SF; Suardi N; Francesco M; Alberto B; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27289238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate MRI added to CAPRA, MSKCC and Partin cancer nomograms significantly enhances the prediction of adverse findings and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Sandeman K; Eineluoto JT; Pohjonen J; Erickson A; Kilpeläinen TP; Järvinen P; Santti H; Petas A; Matikainen M; Marjasuo S; Kenttämies A; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235779. PubMed ID: 32645056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-institutional validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict disease recurrence and mortality after radical prostatectomy.
Punnen S; Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 23587869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative systems models more accurately predict risk of significant disease progression than standard risk groups and a 10-year postoperative nomogram: potential impact on the receipt of adjuvant therapy after surgery.
Donovan MJ; Khan FM; Powell D; Bayer-Zubek V; Cordon-Cardo C; Costa J; Eastham J; Scardino P
BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21771247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer.
Tiberi D; Rodrigues G; Pickles T; Morris J; Crook J; Martin AG; Cury F; Catton C; Lukka H; Warner A; Taussky D
Can Urol Assoc J; 2017; 11(3-4):94-100. PubMed ID: 28515807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative performance and external validation of the multivariable PREDICT Prostate tool for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a study in 69,206 men from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe).
Thurtle D; Bratt O; Stattin P; Pharoah P; Gnanapragasam V
BMC Med; 2020 Jun; 18(1):139. PubMed ID: 32539712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Addition of Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma Presence to Prostate Biopsy Reporting Strengthens Pretreatment Risk Stratification Using CAPRA and NCCN Tools.
Downes MR; Liu KN; Yu Y; Lajkosz K; Kroon LJ; Hollemans E; Fleshner N; Finelli A; van Leenders GJLH; Iczkowski KA; van der Kwast TH
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2024 Feb; 22(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 37558528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Limited Incremental Value Over the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Preradical Prostatectomy Nomogram.
Weaver JK; Kim EH; Vetter JM; Shetty A; Grubb RL; Strope SA; Andriole GL
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():119-128. PubMed ID: 29217354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimum Tools for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Accuracy and Validity.
Campbell JM; Raymond E; O'Callaghan ME; Vincent AD; Beckmann KR; Roder D; Evans S; McNeil J; Millar J; Zalcberg J; Borg M; Moretti KL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Oct; 15(5):e827-e834. PubMed ID: 28666689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An external validation of the Candiolo nomogram in a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated by external-beam radiotherapy.
Gabriele D; Guarneri A; Bartoncini S; Munoz F; Tamponi M; Russo F; Stamatakos G; Guiot C; Regge D; Ricardi U
Radiat Oncol; 2021 May; 16(1):85. PubMed ID: 33952288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy.
Klein EA; Yousefi K; Haddad Z; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Stephenson AJ; Li J; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Davicioni E
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 25466945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of cribriform pattern 4 and intraductal prostatic carcinoma on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Cancer of Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) patient stratification.
Yu Y; Lajkosz K; Finelli A; Fleshner N; van der Kwast TH; Downes MR
Mod Pathol; 2022 Nov; 35(11):1695-1701. PubMed ID: 35676330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison between multiparametric MRI, the partin tables, memorial sloan kettering cancer center nomogram, and CAPRA score in predicting extraprostatic cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Zanelli E; Giannarini G; Cereser L; Zuiani C; Como G; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Girometti R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1604-1613. PubMed ID: 30957321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
