1138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31607197)
21. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stage IB1 cervical cancer treated with modified radical or radical hysterectomy: does size determine risk factors?
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Güngördük Ö; Özdemir İA; Gölbaşı C; Budak A; Çakır İ; Gökçü M; Sancı M; Güngördük K
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(12):667-671. PubMed ID: 30618033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic factors affecting the outcome of early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and post-operative adjuvant therapy.
Liu MT; Hsu JC; Liu WS; Wang AY; Huang WT; Chang TH; Pi CP; Huang CY; Huang CC; Chou PH; Chen TH
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 Mar; 17(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18302655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation.
Lin HH; Cheng WF; Chan KW; Chang DY; Chen CK; Huang SC
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 88(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 8692515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical outcomes of patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.
Mahawerawat S; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Suprasert P; Sae-Teng CT
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5375-8. PubMed ID: 24175829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma of stage Ib and IIa].
Chen L; Lü WG; Xie X; Chen HZ; Yu H; Ni XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 40(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 15924669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04).
Kwon J; Eom KY; Kim YS; Park W; Chun M; Lee J; Kim YB; Yoon WS; Kim JH; Choi JH; Chang SK; Jeong BK; Lee SH; Cha J
Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 50(3):964-974. PubMed ID: 29081219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictive Factors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Nanthamongkolkul K; Hanprasertpong J
Oncol Res Treat; 2018; 41(4):194-198. PubMed ID: 29562222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Isolated full-thickness cervical stromal invasion warrants post-hysterectomy pelvic radiotherapy in FIGO stages IB-IIA uterine cervical carcinoma.
Moon SH; Wu HG; Ha SW; Lee HP; Kang SB; Song YS; Park NH; Kim JW; Park IA; Kim BH
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 16935323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-risk group in node-positive patients with stage IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and postoperative pelvic irradiation.
Aoki Y; Sasaki M; Watanabe M; Sato T; Tsuneki I; Aida H; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 May; 77(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 10785483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lack of effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix Stage IB and IIA treated with preoperative irradiation and surgery.
Grigsby PW; Perez CA; Chao KS; Elbendary A; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Mutch DG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):645-51. PubMed ID: 10524418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer in Jilin, China: A retrospective study.
Yan W; Qiu S; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Si L; Lv S; Liu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(40):e17301. PubMed ID: 31577720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Twelve years experience with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Suprasert P; Srisomboon J; Charoenkwan K; Siriaree S; Cheewakriangkrai C; Kietpeerakool C; Phongnarisorn C; Sae-Teng J
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 30(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 20373935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
