BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31607526)

  • 21. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
    Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional mammography yields higher cancer detection compared to digital mammography alone, also in dense breasts and in younger women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110324. PubMed ID: 35576720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.
    Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
    Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria.
    Houssami N; Lockie D; Clemson M; Pridmore V; Taylor D; Marr G; Evans J; Macaskill P
    Med J Aust; 2019 Oct; 211(8):357-362. PubMed ID: 31448816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis - 4 year experience and comparison with national data.
    Pan HB; Wong KF; Yao A; Hsu GC; Chou CP; Liang HL; Huang JS; Li HJ; Wang SC; Yang TL
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 81(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 29129518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast cancer screening using synthesized two-dimensional mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zeng B; Yu K; Gao L; Zeng X; Zhou Q
    Breast; 2021 Oct; 59():270-278. PubMed ID: 34329948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in women with dense breasts - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phi XA; Tagliafico A; Houssami N; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):380. PubMed ID: 29615072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma.
    Onega T; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Henderson LM; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson ANA; Weaver D; Sprague BL; Bowles EJA; di Florio-Alexander RM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Dec; 202(3):505-514. PubMed ID: 37697031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings.
    Conant EF; Talley MM; Parghi CR; Sheh BC; Liang SY; Pohlman S; Rane A; Jung Y; Stevens LAS; Paulus JK; Alsheik N
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(3):e221571. PubMed ID: 36916891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Synthetic Mammography, and Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Alabousi M; Wadera A; Kashif Al-Ghita M; Kashef Al-Ghetaa R; Salameh JP; Pozdnyakov A; Zha N; Samoilov L; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Sadeghirad B; Freitas V; McInnes MD; Alabousi A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Jun; 113(6):680-690. PubMed ID: 33372954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
    Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
    Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survey Results Regarding Uptake and Impact of Synthetic Digital Mammography With Tomosynthesis in the Screening Setting.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Jan; 17(1 Pt A):31-37. PubMed ID: 31415739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.