BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31608725)

  • 1. Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study.
    Levin G; Ezra Y; Weill Y; Kabiri D; Pollack RN; Rottenstreich A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):3008-3013. PubMed ID: 31608725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ritodrine versus salbutamol for external cephalic version.
    Levin G; Cahan T; Weill Y; Axelrod M; Pollack RN; Meyer R
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 74(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 35107244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tocolysis in term breech external cephalic version.
    Nor Azlin MI; Haliza H; Mahdy ZA; Anson I; Fahya MN; Jamil MA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jan; 88(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15617697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Employing nifedipine as a tocolytic agent prior to external cephalic version.
    Salim R; Zafran N; Nachum Z; Edelstein S; Shalev E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 18382870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Marquette GP; Boucher M; Thériault D; Rinfret D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):859-61. PubMed ID: 8885736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study.
    Burgos J; Eguiguren N; Quintana E; Cobos P; Centeno Mdel M; Larrieta R; Fernández-Llebrez L
    J Perinat Med; 2010; 38(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20047524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience.
    Boucher M; Bujold E; Marquette GP; Vezina Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 14526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sublingual nitroglycerine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version: a comparative study.
    Bujold E; Sergerie M; Masse A; Verschelden G; Bédard MJ; Dubé J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Mar; 25(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 12610672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique.
    Trobo D; Pintado P; Ortega V; Yllana F; Hernández C; Mendizábal R; De León-Luis J
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):717-723. PubMed ID: 31369397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version.
    Couceiro Naveira E; López Ramón Y Cajal C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 31931641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomised trial.
    Collaris R; Tan PC
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):74-80; discussion 80-1. PubMed ID: 19087079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
    Impey L; Pandit M
    BJOG; 2005 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 15842288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between hospitals' cesarean delivery rates for breech presentation and their success rates for external cephalic version.
    Athiel Y; Girault A; Le Ray C; Goffinet F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():156-163. PubMed ID: 35063899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External cephalic version at term using broad criteria: effect on mode of delivery.
    Mashiach R; Hod M; Kaplan B; Friedman S; Ovadia J; Schoenfeld A
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1995; 22(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 8777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive factors for successful external cephalic version with regional anesthesia.
    Unno S; Ogawa K; Nukariya A; Umehara N; Sago H
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1335-1340. PubMed ID: 36796109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
    Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Riemma G; Schiattarella A; La Verde M; Cianci S; Savoia F; De Franciscis P; Cobellis L; Colacurci N; Morlando M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():86-92. PubMed ID: 33421816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nifedipine versus terbutaline for tocolysis in external cephalic version.
    Mohamed Ismail NA; Ibrahim M; Mohd Naim N; Mahdy ZA; Jamil MA; Mohd Razi ZR
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 102(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 18554601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version.
    Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():178-181. PubMed ID: 30308400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.