221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31608769)
1. A comparison of rigid, semi-rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices: A finite element study.
Biswas JK; Roy S; Rana M; Halder S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Dec; 233(12):1292-1298. PubMed ID: 31608769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of two-level pedicle-screw fixation with different rod materials on lumbar spine: A finite element study.
Biswas JK; Rana M; Majumder S; Karmakar SK; Roychowdhury A
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Mar; 23(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29113764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Oct; 30(10):118. PubMed ID: 31628540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of nonlinearity in the materials used for the semi-rigid pedicle screw systems on biomechanical behaviors of the lumbar spine after surgery.
Kim H; Lim DH; Oh HJ; Lee KY; Lee SJ
Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 6(5):055005. PubMed ID: 21849724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design and development of a novel expanding flexible rod device (FRD) for stability in the lumbar spine: A finite-element study.
Rana M; Roy S; Biswas P; Biswas SK; Biswas JK
Int J Artif Organs; 2020 Dec; 43(12):803-810. PubMed ID: 32342767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhang M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2342-2350. PubMed ID: 33948750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
Bozkuş H; Senoğlu M; Baek S; Sawa AG; Ozer AF; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs.
Gornet MF; Chan FW; Coleman JC; Murrell B; Nockels RP; Taylor BA; Lanman TH; Ochoa JA
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081009. PubMed ID: 21950902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by short-segment pedicle screw fixation using a combination of two additional pedicle screws and vertebroplasty at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis.
Liao JC; Chen WP; Wang H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jun; 18(1):262. PubMed ID: 28619021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thoracic vertebra fixation with a novel screw-plate system based on computed tomography imaging and finite element method.
Zhang W; Zhao J; Jiang X; Li L; Yu C; Zhao Y; Si H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():104990. PubMed ID: 31345591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis.
Jahng TA; Kim YE; Moon KY
Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative finite element analysis of artificial intervertebral disc replacement and pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine.
Biswas JK; Malas A; Majumdar S; Rana M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Dec; 25(16):1812-1820. PubMed ID: 35152795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limiting interpedicular screw displacement increases shear forces in screws: A finite element study.
Lima LVPC; Charles YP; Rouch P; Skalli W
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):721-726. PubMed ID: 28554810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress distribution in vertebral bone and pedicle screw and screw-bone load transfers among various fixation methods for lumbar spine surgical alignment: A finite element study.
Xu M; Yang J; Lieberman I; Haddas R
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jan; 63():26-32. PubMed ID: 30344069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of unilateral semi-rigid and dynamic stabilization on ovine vertebrae.
Karakoyun DO; Özkaya M; Okutan VC; Dalgıç A; Belen D; Demir T
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Nov; 229(11):778-85. PubMed ID: 26503839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.
Lim TH; Kim JG; Fujiwara A; Yoon TT; Lee SC; Ha JW; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2498-503. PubMed ID: 11707718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
