BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31608939)

  • 1. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Duan X; Yue J; Chen C; Gong L; Ma Z; Shang X; Yu Z; Jiang H
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6108-6116. PubMed ID: 33104915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Liu B; Qiu ML; Feng Z; Lin NL; Yu MJ; Li X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 101(29):2316-2321. PubMed ID: 34333948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-Assisted Versus Thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Trung LV; Loc NVV; Tien TPD; Ai BD; Lam TLQ; Vuong NL
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 May; 26(5):1093-1096. PubMed ID: 34786664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Induction Therapy on Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Duan X; Gong L; Yue J; Shang X; Ma Z; Tang P; Chen C; Jiang H; Yu Z
    Dig Surg; 2020; 37(6):463-471. PubMed ID: 32728007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
    Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short- and long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with obstructive ventilatory disorder: a propensity score-matched study.
    Goto H; Oshikiri T; Kato T; Sawada R; Harada H; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8834-8842. PubMed ID: 35546208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prophylactic thoracic duct ligation is associated with poor prognosis and regional lymph node relapse in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen JY; Liu QW; Zhang SS; Li JB; Yang H; Wen J; Fu JH
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 122(2):336-343. PubMed ID: 32410255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surgical start time on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Zhao XL; Li KK; Wang YJ; Guo W
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Jun; 34(6):. PubMed ID: 33015706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerves in minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
    Zhao L; He J; Qin Y; Liu H; Li S; Han Z; Li L
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Jul; 35(7):. PubMed ID: 34864953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy between robot-assisted and thoracoscopy-laparoscopy-assisted radical esophageal cancer surgery].
    He ZF; Zheng TL; Liu DL; Yang Y; Zhu DY; Wu K; Wang LP; Zhao S
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 32306608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable approach for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.
    Ma J; Wang W; Zhang B; Li X; Wu J; Wu Z
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Jan; 46(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 33678638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Yüksel S; Topal U; Songür MZ; Çalıkoğlu İ; Karaköse E; Ercan E; Teke Z; Bektaş H
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Jan; 20(1):410-416. PubMed ID: 38554354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.