These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31608939)

  • 1. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Chao YK; Hsieh MJ; Liu YH; Liu HP
    World J Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(2):590-598. PubMed ID: 28801820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Duan X; Yue J; Chen C; Gong L; Ma Z; Shang X; Yu Z; Jiang H
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6108-6116. PubMed ID: 33104915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Liu B; Qiu ML; Feng Z; Lin NL; Yu MJ; Li X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 101(29):2316-2321. PubMed ID: 34333948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (REVATE trial).
    Chao YK; Li Z; Jiang H; Wen YW; Chiu CH; Li B; Shang X; Fang TJ; Yang Y; Yue J; Zhang X; Zhang C; Liu YH
    Br J Surg; 2024 Jul; 111(7):. PubMed ID: 38960881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
    Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thoracic Duct Resection During Esophagectomy Does Not Contribute to Improved Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched-Cohort Study.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Goto H; Otsubo D; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4053-4061. PubMed ID: 31313045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.
    Yamashita K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Tanaka K; Hara T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 28881906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Oncologic Outcomes for Patients with Middle to Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Surgical Treatment Using the Ivor-Lewis or McKeown Operation.
    Park SY; Park B; Jeon YJ; Lee J; Cho JH; Choi YS; Zo JI; Shim YM; Kim HK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Nov; 31(12):7750-7758. PubMed ID: 39068316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-Assisted Versus Thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Trung LV; Loc NVV; Tien TPD; Ai BD; Lam TLQ; Vuong NL
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 May; 26(5):1093-1096. PubMed ID: 34786664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Induction Therapy on Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Duan X; Gong L; Yue J; Shang X; Ma Z; Tang P; Chen C; Jiang H; Yu Z
    Dig Surg; 2020; 37(6):463-471. PubMed ID: 32728007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical feasibility and oncological outcomes of robotic esophagectomy compared with conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy for clinical T3 or T4 locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Daiko H; Oguma J; Ishiyama K; Kurita D; Kubo K; Kubo Y; Utsunomiya D; Igaue S; Nozaki R; Leng XF; Fujita T; Fujiwara H
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jul; 38(7):3590-3601. PubMed ID: 38755464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
    Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short- and long-term outcomes of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Wang YJ; Li KK; Liu XH; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5023-5029. PubMed ID: 31828499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.