195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31609284)
1. Discrepancies between Registered and Published Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials within the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review.
Hudson AS; Morzycki AD; Samargandi OA; Williams JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):245-255. PubMed ID: 31609284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The heart of the matter: Outcome reporting bias and registration status in cardio-thoracic surgery.
Wiebe J; Detten G; Scheckel C; Gearhart D; Wheeler D; Sanders D; Vassar M
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 227():299-304. PubMed ID: 27839821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in 585 clinical trials investigating drugs for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Riemer M; Kranke P; Helf A; Mayer D; Popp M; Schlesinger T; Meybohm P; Weibel S
BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):249. PubMed ID: 34666681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.
Jones CW; Keil LG; Holland WC; Caughey MC; Platts-Mills TF
BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():282. PubMed ID: 26581191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials.
Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L
J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Li XQ; Yang GL; Tao KM; Zhang HQ; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 24131272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs.
Rasmussen N; Lee K; Bero L
Trials; 2009 Dec; 10():116. PubMed ID: 20015404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancies Between Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Corresponding Manuscripts Reported in Anesthesiology Journals.
De Oliveira GS; Jung MJ; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1030-1033. PubMed ID: 26378702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
Smith SM; Wang AT; Pereira A; Chang DR; McKeown A; Greene K; Rowbotham MC; Burke LB; Coplan P; Gilron I; Hertz SH; Katz NP; Lin AH; McDermott MP; Papadopoulos EJ; Rappaport BA; Sweeney M; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
Pain; 2013 Dec; 154(12):2769-2774. PubMed ID: 23962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discussion: Discrepancies between Registered and Published Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials within the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review.
Kim YJ; Chung KC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):256-257. PubMed ID: 31881628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
Wayant C; Scheckel C; Hicks C; Nissen T; Leduc L; Som M; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178379. PubMed ID: 28570573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Researching Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.
Lemmens CMC; van Amerongen S; Strijbis EM; Killestein J
Neurology; 2024 Mar; 102(6):e208032. PubMed ID: 38408286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.
Howard B; Scott JT; Blubaugh M; Roepke B; Scheckel C; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180986. PubMed ID: 28727834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
