These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31609982)

  • 1. The impact of shared knowledge on speakers' prosody.
    Michelas A; Cau C; Champagne-Lavau M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223640. PubMed ID: 31609982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On how accent distribution can signal speaker adaptation.
    Kaland C; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Phonetica; 2012; 69(4):216-30. PubMed ID: 24060967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?
    Damen D; van der Wijst P; van Amelsvoort M; Krahmer E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):257-288. PubMed ID: 30219958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What's in a Name? Interlocutors Dynamically Update Expectations about Shared Names.
    Gegg-Harrison WM; Tanenhaus MK
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():212. PubMed ID: 26955361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planning and coordination of utterances in a joint naming task.
    Hoedemaker RS; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):732-752. PubMed ID: 29999401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Cognitive Load Influences Speakers' Choice of Referring Expressions.
    Vogels J; Krahmer E; Maes A
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1396-418. PubMed ID: 25471259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aren't Prosody and Syntax Marking Bias in Questions?
    Arnhold A; Braun B; Romero M
    Lang Speech; 2021 Mar; 64(1):141-180. PubMed ID: 32508231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.
    Arnold JE; Kahn JM; Pancani GC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22419403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lost in thought: cognitive load and the processing of addressees' feedback in verbal communication.
    Rossnagel CS
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 15267127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism.
    Beeke S; Wilkinson R; Maxim J
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Feb; 23(2):133-55. PubMed ID: 19197582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosodic variation in southern British English.
    Peppé S; Maxim J; Wells B
    Lang Speech; 2000; 43(Pt 3):309-34. PubMed ID: 11216298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for the listener: comparing the production of contrastive intonation in typically-developing speakers and speakers with autism.
    Kaland C; Swerts M; Krahmer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2182-96. PubMed ID: 23967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10743382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome.
    Shriberg LD; Paul R; McSweeny JL; Klin AM; Cohen DJ; Volkmar FR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):1097-115. PubMed ID: 11708530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interaction of lexical and phrasal prosody in whispered speech.
    Heeren WF; van Heuven VJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3272. PubMed ID: 25480073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.
    Schafer AJ; Speer SR; Warren P; White SD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Mar; 29(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 10709182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do patients with schizophrenia use prosody to encode contrastive discourse status?
    Michelas A; Faget C; Portes C; Lienhart AS; Boyer L; Lançon C; Champagne-Lavau M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():755. PubMed ID: 25101025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the particular: prosody and the coordination of actions.
    Reed BS
    Lang Speech; 2012 Mar; 55(Pt 1):13-34. PubMed ID: 22480024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognizing prosody across modalities, face areas and speakers: examining perceivers' sensitivity to variable realizations of visual prosody.
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 22196745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.