BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31610322)

  • 1. Reason for exam Imaging Reporting and Data System (RI-RADS): A grading system to standardize radiology requisitions.
    Abedi A; Tofighi S; Salehi S; Latterman PT; Basques KD; Gholamrezanezhad A
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108661. PubMed ID: 31610322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reason for Exam Imaging Reporting and Data System: Consensus Reached on Quality Assessment of Radiology Requisitions.
    Tofighi S; Abedi A; Salehi S; Myers L; Reddy S; Gholamrezanezhad A
    J Patient Saf; 2021 Jun; 17(4):e255-e261. PubMed ID: 32168282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of information on imaging requisitions: does it matter?
    Cohen MD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):617-21. PubMed ID: 17845967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of radiology requisition.
    Troude P; Dozol A; Soyer P; Girard D; Martinez F; Montagne B; Segouin C
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23999241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the Transcription of Patient Information From Image Requisitions to the Radiology Information System.
    DiRoberto C; Lehto C; Baccei SJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Aug; 13(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 27233910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online Error Reporting for Managing Quality Control Within Radiology.
    Golnari P; Forsberg D; Rosipko B; Sunshine JL
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Jun; 29(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 26510753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency and analysis of non-clinical errors made in radiology reports using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System voice recognition dictation software.
    Motyer RE; Liddy S; Torreggiani WC; Buckley O
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 185(4):921-927. PubMed ID: 27696148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.
    Johnson AJ; Ying J; Swan JS; Williams LS; Applegate KE; Littenberg B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 17411639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Requests for radiologic imaging: Prevalence and determinants of inadequate quality according to RI-RADS.
    Kasalak Ö; Alnahwi HAA; Dierckx RAJO; Yakar D; Kwee TC
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109615. PubMed ID: 33657477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Audit procedure of radiology reports in a hospital service].
    Barrau V; Rufat P; Charrada L; Menu Y
    J Radiol; 2002 Jun; 83(6 Pt 1):717-21. PubMed ID: 12149588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2015 AMCLC Open-Microphone Session: Improving the IQ (Information Quality) of What We Do.
    Stern E; Metter D; Everett C; Flug J; Herrington W; Applegate KE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 26768547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adding Value in Radiology Reporting.
    Goldberg-Stein S; Chernyak V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Sep; 16(9 Pt B):1292-1298. PubMed ID: 31492407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrity of clinical information in computerized order requisitions for diagnostic imaging.
    Lacson R; Laroya R; Wang A; Kapoor N; Glazer DI; Shinagare A; Ip IK; Malhotra S; Hentel K; Khorasani R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1651-1656. PubMed ID: 30517649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [To improve the quality of requisitions for radiologic examinations].
    Roussel P; Lelièvre N
    J Radiol; 2002 May; 83(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 12063424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Possible solution for the problem of unread image interpretation reports: the "Gunma University Star Search".
    Tsushima Y; Hirasawa H; Wakabayashi Y; Taketomi-Takahashi A; Sutou T; Tanaka K; Takizawa M; Komatsu Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):643-648. PubMed ID: 32185670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method of evaluating the quality of radiology reports.
    Lee R; Cohen MD; Jennings GS
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 16428061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiology Reporting: Current Practices and an Introduction to Patient-Centered Opportunities for Improvement.
    Mityul MI; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Mangano MD; Demertzis JL; Gunn AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):376-385. PubMed ID: 29140114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved Quality of Thyroid Ultrasound Reports After Implementation of the ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Nodule Lexicon and Risk Stratification System.
    Griffin AS; Mitsky J; Rawal U; Bronner AJ; Tessler FN; Hoang JK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 May; 15(5):743-748. PubMed ID: 29503150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: What the Pathologist Needs to Know.
    Tang A; Valasek MA; Sirlin CB
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2015 Sep; 22(5):314-22. PubMed ID: 26262514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.