These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31610738)

  • 21. Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.
    Nicholls ME; McIlroy AM
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 20178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pseudoneglect is maintained in aging but not in mild Alzheimer's disease: new insights from an enumeration task.
    Brignani D; Bagattini C; Mazza V
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():276-283. PubMed ID: 29428770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults.
    Learmonth G; Papadatou-Pastou M
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2022 Jun; 32(2):438-457. PubMed ID: 33890188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Listening to white noise counteracts visual and haptic pseudoneglect.
    Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Vecchi T; Vallar G
    Perception; 2012; 41(11):1395-8. PubMed ID: 23513624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
    Tomer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.
    Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial bias and right hemisphere function: sex-specific changes with aging.
    Chen P; Goedert KM; Murray E; Kelly K; Ahmeti S; Barrett AM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 May; 17(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 21320378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Asymmetrical distractibility of global and focal visuospatial attention during segmental and total compound line bisections.
    Mosquera DM; Lamb DG; Garcia AM; Rodriguez JA; Correa LN; Salazar L; Schwartz ZJ; Cohen RA; Falchook AD; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychology; 2018 Oct; 32(7):843-849. PubMed ID: 29985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Top-down control of the left visual field bias in cued visual spatial attention.
    Meyyappan S; Rajan A; Mangun GR; Ding M
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Apr; 33(9):5097-5107. PubMed ID: 36245213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The right hemisphere is independent from the left hemisphere in allocating visuospatial attention.
    Zuanazzi A; Cattaneo L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():197-205. PubMed ID: 28602998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Right fronto-parietal dysfunction underlying spatial attention in bipolar disorder.
    Najt P; Bayer U; Hausmann M
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 23916624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?
    Nicholls ME; Roberts GR
    Cortex; 2002 Apr; 38(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 12056684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2000 May; 6(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 10902414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.